User talk:Tommajor

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~ ~ ~. Four tildes (~ ~ ) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I guess I'm still getting used to the way wikipedia is set up. I didn't mean to step on anyone's feet. I thought that was just clarifying some things in the articles I had edited. I guess one could call me a n00b at this.


 * Here are some helpful guidelines that'll improve your contributions: keeping a neutral point of view, and some general advice on editing. I'll go back and restore that general welcome message as well! --Ashiibaka tlk 05:20, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * There we go. (Bah, that NPoV article is kind of long, who wants to make a summary?) --Ashiibaka tlk

just to clean it up a bit, I think I'll get rid of some of the older messages on here, if you don't mind that is.
 * It's not considered polite to remove messages until about two weeks after they're posted (I've personally never removed any), but as long as you're going to be a bit less carefree about your future edits I guess you can keep this page clean. Ashiibaka tlk 06:08, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Removing the messages from your page speaks volumes about your purpose in being here. This is a collaborative effort and talk pages are a place where a lot of that collaboration is done. Wiping out the talk sends the message that you do not wish to collaborate. Reverting edits sends the same message. You can defend the edits you wish to make on the talk page of articles you contribute to. Again, I urge you not to restrict your contributions to churches you frequent, radio stations you listen to (if indeed you are not more closely involved in one or both) or issues you feel personally strong about.Dr Zen 06:35, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I was just removing the 'posts' that were not collaborative. Like these ones. These aren't getting any of us anywhere. And I will defend the right as a Wikipedian to put historical information on Wikipedia for whatever issue I want. I realize I may be posting things that others haven't heard about, but such is the nature of much of the information on Wikipedia. Nobody is expected to know an entire encyclopedia. I put this information on because I know that there are thousands of people that know about these organizations and wouldn't mind having this information. If anyone doesn't like what I post, it would be a better courtesy to me if they would atleast tell me before just removing it. I am a reasonable person and can deal with it. Well, got to go to bed for now. It's 1:41am where I am ;-)


 * Your recent contributions have been more helpful, good work! Ashiibaka tlk 07:03, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Tom, may I ask what was "non-collaborative" in the following message?
 * Please do not just enter on the image pages without specifying a source to back that up. That goes for Image:02weeks.jpg too. Thanks in advance! Please take it a little easy when dealing with topics where you know positions vary greatly and where you have a radical point of view. &mdash; David Remahl 22:02, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I don't have anything against you personally, but I think you should be a bit more responsive. Anyway, that wasn't the reason I came here...Image:Peterandjohnhorseback.jpg &mdash; It says the uploader has permission to use the image. Does that mean that the owner of the copyright licensed the image under the GFDL, or only that it may be used on Wikipedia? By permission images are deprecated and may be deleted in the future (see Image copyright tags for more info. It would be great if you could convince the owner of the image to license it under a more liberal license. Also, may I ask what the image is used for? The "Pages that use this image" function is broken, so one can never be sure, but it seems it is unused. &mdash; David Remahl 21:20, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

that image will be used in a article about river valley ranch. I have been rewriting the article to not sound like a advertisement, but more of a historical document. That image will go in there.--Tommajor 21:25, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)

Minor stylistic points
Hi again Tom! I have a few stylistic nit-picks for you now :-). Yes, I admit that I've been looking through your list of contributions, mainly because your removal of my comments from your talk page made me suspicious. I've noticed a few things:

's as much as you do. Simple blank lines will do in 99% of the cases.
 * 1) Don't use
 * 1) Only link the first occurrence of a word in an article / section. An example is your edit to Genocide_and_ethnic_conflict_in_Israel_and_Palestine, where you linked Palestinians to Palestine (good edit, but it only needs to be done once.)

Sincerely, &mdash; David Remahl 21:49, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

thanks for the suggestions. definitely makes things easier... probably less load on the server to
 * You're welcome! &mdash; David Remahl 22:13, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

VfD and notice of response
Hi, I responded to your queries on the valley ranch talk page. Looking forward to reading your response.

I also saw that you listed an article for deletion. I can't see the point of it either, it is really messy...However, you seem to have stopped in the middle of the VfD procedure. You have to create a subpage on VfD for it and include the motive for listing it on VfD there. Then you edit WP:VFD and add a line referencing the votes page. There are full instructions on VfD. If you want, I can help you with the "paperwork". &mdash; David Remahl 23:02, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Image source
Thank you for uploading Image:HBCchildren.gif. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. Also the other related images. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 14:11, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image deletion
Listed under Images and media for deletion/2005 September 9. Thunderbrand 15:58, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mspowerpoint2003.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mspowerpoint2003.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Peterandjohnhorseback.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peterandjohnhorseback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 18:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of River Valley Ranch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article River Valley Ranch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/River Valley Ranch & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)