User talk:Tommy1716

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from SqueakBox! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:
 * Biographies of living persons
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Neutral point of view
 * Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
 * Attribution
 * Verifiability
 * Assume good faith
 * Civility
 * Words to avoid
 * Requests for oversight
 * Requests_for_page_protection
 * Requests_for_comment
 * Wikipedia:Block log
 * Requests for mediation
 * Administrators' noticeboard
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
 * Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
 * Requests for arbitration
 * Articles for deletion
 * Images and media for deletion
 * Requests for checkuser
 * Usernames for administrator attention
 * Avoid the word "vandal"
 * No legal threats
 * Mediation Cabal

Again, welcome. Thanks, SqueakBox 16:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Rydal Penrhos
Why do you keep removing Keith Tewkesbury from the infobox? He is the school's chaplain, so why do you keep removing it? – PeeJay 21:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Burrell
Infomation on Burrell's testimony to the Diana inquest does need to be included, but in a neutral and concise way, in balanced prose. Your edits use subjective terms such as "muddled" and "confused" and suggest ulterior motives for Burrells actions, which is pure speculation. Please edit under your user name as well. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 22:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I can only reiterate my above point. The fact that the articles you cite start by describing him as "humiliated" and "shamefaced" and "strapped for cash" only display their naked non-neutral point of view. Please reply to my compromise on my talk page. You write that you want to "give sthe readers of the page histoiry behind the story of Burrell in general", this is AMPLY done by facts, not sensationalism. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)