User talk:Tommy Kronkvist/Archive 2016–2018

Merger discussion for Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity
Articles that you have been involved in editing&mdash; Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity&mdash;have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nessie (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Neobisium incertum
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Tommy Kronkvist, thanks for creating Neobisium incertum!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your source(s).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I've added the primary reference by the author of the taxon plus an ITIS link and a reference by Mark Harvey at the Western Australian Museum, Government of Western Australia. If nothing else, it's a start. :) Tommy Kronkvist (talk), Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 16:55, 9 July 2018 (UTC).

Ways to improve Neobisium beroni
Hi, I'm SkyGazer 512. Tommy Kronkvist, thanks for creating Neobisium beroni!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be great if you could add some reliable sources to the article, so that the information can be easily verified (i.e. how do you know that it's only been found in Bulgaria?).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi and thank your for your note. I've added a few sources, among them a reference to the taxon author's work plus a reference to Mark Harvey at the Western Australian Museum regarding type locality etc. It's still a stub, but at least now it cites verifiable sources, including data about the species' distribution. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 02:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC).
 * The sources you added are most definitely suitable. Thank you!-- SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 02:41, 9 September 2018 (UTC)