User talk:Tommyranger

August 2020
Hello, I'm Nyook. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Genghis Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Nyook ✉  13:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Afro-Asians into Miscegenation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Sandbox
Hello, is there a reason why you are adding gibberish to your sandbox in rapid succession? --   LuK3      (Talk)   12:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC) Yes. I was just testing my gibbering. I though I had privacy. I was wrong.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tommyranger/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Tommyranger/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pavlov2 (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Pavlov2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Pavlov2 (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC) I was simply using the sandbox because I want to test it and see it's functions. I tried it only in my Sandbox. How is that promotional ?

Nomination of Chloé Winkel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chloé Winkel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chloé Winkel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
{{unblock reviewed|decline=Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon{{sup| &#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; }} 20:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)|1=The reason I should be unblocked is because I'm protecting wikipedia from blocked users manipulative edits. Drmies you accepted the request of a brand new 2022 April of 9th account. I find it ironic you don't think anything suspicious. I should also be unblocked because I'm doing a much better job at preserving accurate sources for wikipedia that had been repeatedly removed by blocked editor who is carrying his own agenda ( WarriorsCreaterFighter or the Austrian IP that changed location). Nobody but me had the time to check the misleading edits. All my edits have always been neutral and accurate for wikipedia. I know I won't be unblocked no matter what. I just want wikipedians and admins to do something about the misinformation of edited wikipedia pages by the SAME BLOCKED AUSTRIAN IP USER. If the same wikipedia admin will check and edit the pages that wikipedian abuser will never come back again.

Motivation of the same blocked user: Completely East Asianize ethnic Uyghurs and Ainu racially and genetically and removing/and minizing every genetic and physical description that gives Ainu and Uyghur a sense of caucasianess.

BLOCKED BY THE SAME MYSTERIOUS NEW IP USERS : This is the same Chinese user who shamelessly pretending to be multiple ethnicities ( Japanese, Turkmen, Ainu and other Caucasian ethnicities in Youtube, Quora and other platforms ). And sadly this Austrian IP user is just promoting the 50 cent stereotype in the worst way possible. He is so easy to read and spot out, he doesn't even know it.

Uyghurs
Recently KinhyaKing had restored edits by the same BLOCKED EDITOR Quapaw. Which is removing the genetic information that gives some Uyghurs being predominant Caucasian in one genetic study such as the Uyghurs are Hotan being 60% West Eurasian and 40% East Asian had been edited since 2011 and other genetic study that give Uyghur as much as 63% and 84% West Eurasian. This is what he doesn't want people to read when they go to wikipedia.

Ainu
A brand new 2022 April of 9th account 213.162.80.160 decides to remove every sourced information and pictures that gives Ainu a physical description that resembles Russians.

And again restoring his fake source that says " The numerous large Kabata and Hidaka Ainu clans largely resembled Northeast Asians and Northeastern Siberians, rather than Europeans. The physical differences between Ainu and neighboring Japanese and Koreans, was found to be not as large as early historians suggested. Many Ainu men have abundant wavy hair and often have long beards. There was also a number of mixed Russian-Ainu individuals. "

Where does the source even say that ? Yet it has been allowed to fool people into fake edits this long https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Illness_and_Healing_Among_the_Sakhalin_A/OTo9AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA19&printsec=frontcover

Xinjiang and in History of Xinjiang.
You can see the wiki page in those basically tries minimize west eurasian and give the strongest impression that the Tarim mummies who a proven to be Caucasoid/West Eurasian as something like a hybrid of east asian-caucasian. Tommyranger (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)}}

Distortion in the Uyghur genetic study
You being a Turkic editor, I hope you can restore information on Uyghurs genetics. The Uyghur genetic page was previously heavily distorted by multiple blocked accounts and include recently. I just want to inform you Recently KinhyaKing had restored edits by the same BLOCKED EDITOR Quapaw. Which is removing the genetic information that gives some Uyghurs being predominant Caucasian in one genetic study such as the Uyghurs are Hotan being 60% West Eurasian and 40% East Asian had been edited since 2011 and other genetic study that give Uyghur as much as 63% and 84% West Eurasian. The person has a agenda not wanting Uyghur to ever be considered Caucasian and also the user has a agenda to make sure every Uyghur and Chinese is as close to similar as possible.Tommyranger (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Beshogur, if you have read my message but decided to ignore it anyway than please tell me. I saw that you recently edit but I have no idea if you are receiving this message I'm sending to you. I understand I'm a blocked user so please tell me if you are receiving this reply so I can quit if I know you not interested in talking to blocked users.Tommyranger (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked users may not use their talk pages to solicit edits. Please desist. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 15:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)