User talk:Tomnelson17

Oakland Raiders
Please don't add junk to Wikipedia like you did with Oakland Raiders. It is considered vandalism. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 14:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Budget
Your recent edit to Budget (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Test
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Oden 15:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for 24 hours for incivility (this edit). I don't even know what you were referring to, unless you mean my reverting your vandalism on Oakland Raiders. Please calm down during those 24 hours. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 15:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * After reading your comments to other users who have been reverting your vandalism, your block has been increased to one week. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:VANDAL while you are on break. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 15:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree Tom
Tom I agree with what you said to that idiot who blocked you. I saw those revisions you made, and I thought you deserved a barnstar. As I should, I'm going to leave "the idiot" a warning, and if I have to...a FINAL WARNING(I'm not quite sure how many it will take though).Tedbrinks33 14:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Tom, please stop being a dumbass. I've indefblocked your obvious sockpuppet Tedbrinks33.  Your one week block on this account has been restarted (you are again blocked for one week from today).  I have no faith that you'll be anything but an annoyance to Wikipedia, but we'll give you a chance anyway.  └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 15:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

what is a sockpuppet?
I know how weird it looks when I keep popping up everywhere even when you keep blocking me somehow but I'm just curious on what a sockpuppet is? If you could let me know and since you'll probably block this computer I'll get back to you when I'm unblocked. I'm a new wikipedian around here and I'm just wondering if you could kind of show me the ropes. If you could just leave me some tips and I'd appreciate it. I was only joking around and was trying to impress you. Thanks-Tom
 * WP:SOCK. └ <b style="color:blue;">OzLawyer</b> / <i style="color:black;">talk</i> ┐ 15:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Oz
Oz you are now my best friend. Someday I will buy this great organization and you can be my co-ruler. You are the greatest and together, we can save the world...one article at a time.-Tom

Tom...
Please stop bothering me, Tom. Thanks. └ <b style="color:blue;">OzLawyer</b> / <i style="color:black;">talk</i> ┐ 14:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked for one month for personal attacks immediately after returning from a one-week ban for the same. I understand you couldn't care less about Wikipedia and are only having some jerk-fun, but I'm getting tired of you. └ <b style="color:blue;">OzLawyer</b> / <i style="color:black;">talk</i> ┐ 15:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked indefinitely for block evasion, personal attacks, vandalism, the whole shebang. └ <b style="color:blue;">OzLawyer</b> / <i style="color:black;">talk</i> ┐ 17:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)