User talk:Tomobe03/Archive03

Good...
...to se you back to editing Wikipedia! :-) --Saxum (talk) 11:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tito–Stalin split
Hello! Your submission of Tito–Stalin split at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Tito-Stalin split
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Tito-Stalin split has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I noticed that the article uses an en dash rather than a hyphen in every instance of "Tito-Stalin". En dashes are generally used for a range of dates, times or numbers. You might want to consider whether these instances should be changed. Congratulations on bringing the article to GA status.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your time and effort. I had a look at the changes you made last night and I am confident that the article is greatly improved now. I'll have a look at the en dash issue, but I'm quite certain the matter will be discussed at the ACR soon.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Informbiro period
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Informbiro period you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 23:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Paškal Buconjić
Greetings there,

I noticed that you included the article in the WikiProject Croatia. Should we do the same for similar articles, such as: Alojzije Mišić, Petar Čule, Ratko Perić? I intend to make all these articles GA. I would appreciate any help from your project and am aware of the connection that exists between the Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. Sometimes it's really hard to distinguish them into separate categories since there's much interdependence between the two (Perić headed the Saint Jerome college in Rome, which regards itself as a Croatian college; Buconjić maintained close relations with Zagreb and so forth). --Governor Sheng (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi there. Yes, I added the WPCro template as the scope of the WP:CRO includes articles related to Croatia or Croats - regardless where they live(d). It is quite alright to have one article tagged with multiple WikiProjects since their interests are likely to overlap. I would suggest you to add other articles as well if they meet this requirement too. A potential benefit for the article from such inclusion is that this might lead to attention from other contributors/reviewers. Of course, this applies to all relevant wiki projects, depending on how their scope is defined. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Informbiro period
The article Informbiro period you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Informbiro period for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Informbiro period
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Informbiro period has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Tito–Stalin split
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Informbiro period
The article Informbiro period you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Informbiro period for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia
Thank you very much for your time and efforts. I'm certain quality of the article has improved as a result of your work. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treaties of Rome (1941), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruling party -- Ruling party (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

In appreciation
PS And when are you going to bite the bullet and nominate one of your fine articles for FA? Gog the Mild (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you . I really appreciate this. And - soon, I promise ;) --Tomobe03 (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 00:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit of Tito–Šubašić Agreements

 * thank you very much.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
The article State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia
The article Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 02:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit of Treaties of Rome (1941)
Hi! Many of my improvements were done as requested, with a focus on improving the quality of prose and grammar. While I corrected any typos that I may have made in the editing process, it would be worth taking another look to make sure that the article is written in accordance with British English, as I and my spellcheck are American, and to double-check all dates mentioned, as I have a learning disability known as dyscalculia that sometimes causes me to switch numbers around. Best of luck with the nomination process! Kncny11 (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you for the time you took to copyedit this article. I have reverted a couple of changes which would otherwise change the meaning of specific sentences, and switched spelling of a couple of words to BE. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaties of Rome (1941)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Treaties of Rome (1941) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaties of Rome (1941)
The article Treaties of Rome (1941) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Treaties of Rome (1941) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 12:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tito–Šubašić Agreements
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tito–Šubašić Agreements you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tito–Šubaši? Agreements
The article Tito–Šubaši? Agreements you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tito–Šubaši? Agreements for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia
The article 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ruling party -- Ruling party (talk) 10:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Legobot doesn't seem to have delivered this (probably because it's a second nomination), so I'm doing it the old-fashioned way. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the in-person delivery. I only just realised this was not Legobot message.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia
The article 6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Extraordinary Writ -- Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Missing cites in 1990 Croatian parliamentary election
The article cites "Hayden 2011" and "Ramet 2003" but no such sources are listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Or are these typos in years? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks for pointing these out. Yes, they appear to be typos. I checked the Ramet reference, and it is found in Ramet's Three Yugoslavias (2006) on the indicated page. Hayden was likewise a typo, but I also changed the ref in the bibliography section a bit. Namely, the Google books seems to indicate that the book was published in 2012, but the book itself (I have access to a copy) says 2013, and the two cites check out fine - so I changed it to 2013. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 07:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 11:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

1 HGZ in afterwar period
Hello,

I would like to discuss your removal of Afterwar paragraph in article 1st Croatian Guards Corps, for saying that the source is unreliable. I would like to point out that I disagree with your statement that the source is unreliable, since it contains direct words of a man (Anri Targuš) who was a member of this unit, and took part in the events and can therefore give a first hand account of what was happening. I think that it is, therefore, unrightfully removed. It also gives an insight to lesser known episode of this unit and it is therefore a worthy contribution to the overall article.

Franjo Tahy (talk) 20:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * , the source is reliable if it meets WP:RS policy which means, among other things, that it is a published source requiring "editorial oversight". Portals such as braniteljski.hr may well report accurately, but portals (usually) fail the oversight criterion. I don't mean to belittle the source of information - it just fails WP:RS. Such interviews are quite useful for further research, especially as first-hand accounts.


 * As indicated in the edit summary removing the information - the information that the 1.HGZ continued to discharge its duty of protecting the President of Croatia adds nothing to the existing information in the article. If the addition were detailing an otherwise unreported combat, this would be quite different. Regards--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia copyedit
, thank you very much for copyediting the article. I had a look at the diffs whenever you edited and I'm very happy how the prose has been improved. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words, ; it helps when a topic is interesting . Stay well and all the best,  Mini  apolis  23:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Peasant Party during World War II
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian Peasant Party during World War II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 18:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've started the review for this article by reading it through, and it is clear that the prose, spelling and grammar need to be attended to. There is too much for me to list, but unless the text is put into correct English the article will be failed. One solution to the problem is to ask for the article to be copy edited at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests—you wait about 3 weeks before it gets done.
 * Are you happy for me to put a request in? Amitchell125 (talk) 20:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi ! Thank you for taking time to review the article. I have already made the request to GOCE a while ago (17 March), and I believe they might be tending to the article quite soon since the request is now near the top of the list. If you find it acceptable, you could resume the review once the GOCE copyedit is done. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll resume post my review comments after you've contacted me to let me know the GOCE copyedit is finished. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 21:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll ping you then.--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , I just wanted to ping you to let you know that the GOCE copyedit is now done. The editor was most helpful in pointing out few other problems. I hope I resolved them satisfactorily. You can review them on the article talk. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, . Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 13:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia
The article State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 23:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much for your kind words !--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem! Vacant0 (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Peasant Party during World War II
The article Croatian Peasant Party during World War II you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Croatian Peasant Party during World War II for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 07:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Peasant Party during World War II
The article Croatian Peasant Party during World War II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatian Peasant Party during World War II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian Spring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petar Šegedin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Croatian Spring
Just dropping by to say very nice job on the article. Back in the day I did some work on it, but it was basically just plugging the holes, hardly anything more than that. Being a fairly major topic, it needed a much more thorough treatment - and it looks like it got one. ;-) I haven't taken a closer look though; I'd volunteer to provide feedback at some point if you're interested. GregorB (talk) 12:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you for your kind words. The article is currently awaiting GOCE copyedit (it's fairly high in the queue now) and then I plan to submit it to GAN and then (if successful) to FAC - i.e. I'll be interested in all sorts of feedback. Also, it occurred to me that the 50th anniversary of 1 Dec Karađorđevo meeting is coming up, so hopefully possibly maybe there might be a TFA.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Re: Telegram clarification
Well, the image caption should explain what's shown, and saying "Random New Proper Name" is shown, in an article not about that, just leads the reader to think "but what is Random New Proper Name?" :) Perhaps "Yugoslav newspaper Telegram"? Or "a contemporary literary newspaper"? --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 19:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

2020 Zagreb flash flood
The article has been promoted. Good job! --Governor Sheng (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message and taking time to review wiki content. However, in this case, I just did some minor tweaks - the original nominator should receive all the credit.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945)
The article Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945)
The article Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 15:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May Declaration, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages South Slavic and Antun Bauer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

PD-Yugoslavia question
I saw your messages on WT:CRO; you seem to be knowledgeable about public domain in Croatia. I'm currently working on expanding the 1964 Zagreb flood article and putting up some pictures. There's a PDF of the day's newspapers here from which I've extracted photos (example). Can you doublecheck that this is PD? Would it somehow be possible to use the map provided here (from this webpage)? I've drafted a fairly long article offline and I'm hoping I can put some photos and illustrations to liven it up ;) Daß Wölf 15:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . Any photograph published in Yugoslavia before 1 January 1966 became public domain on 1 January 1991. This does not mean that photographs published in Yugoslavia on or after 1 January 1966 are not PD. For example, photographs published in (Socialist Republic of) Croatia on or after 1 January 1966 but before 1 January 1971 became public domain on 1 January 1996 under applicable Croatian law. Regardless of any subsequent expiry of copyrights under Croatian law (to stick with that example) later photos are not PD for the purposes of Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia because everything still copyrighted on that day received an extension of copyright in the US (therefore being relevant for the Wikimedia Commons) until expiry of 95 years following publication (i.e. photo published in Croatia on 1 January 1971 will only become PD for Wikimedia Commons on 1 January 2067). The extension of the copyright protection did not apply if the particular work was not copyrighted on 1 January 1971. In short, any photos published in Yugoslav/Croatian papers before 1 January 1971 are ok to use - just make sure you indicate the source and publication date in the Commons, and add two approppriate PD notices: PD-Yugoslavia (for photos published before 1 January 1966) or PD-Croatia (for photos published in 1966-1970 period) and PD-US-1996.
 * As regards the map, I don't think it would be PD and could not be used as such in the article. However, it can be used as a source (if deemed reliable per WP:RS - did not check myself). If the map source is reliable, I'd suggest you to seek help regarding creation of a map at Graphics Lab/Map workshop.
 * Thank you for taking time and effort to contribute to Wikipedia. I'm looking forward to reading the 1964 flood article as soon as I get the chance. I hope the above is helpful to you and please ping me if I can assist with anything. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * And a clarification, when I typed "published in Yugoslav/Croatian papers" I should have said just "published in Yugoslavia/Croatia" - applies to newspapers, journals, books and all other forms of lawful publication.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the detailed reply! In that case I'm also going to upload the photos credited to Zagrebačka panorama's special flood issue. According to the city library, it was published in November 1964. This review states the magazine was published by City of Zagreb's People's Council (Narodni odbor) and intended for a wide audience. Sadly I don't really know much more about it -- I was planning to take a look at it in the library before I finished the article, and hopefully dig up more material about the flood, but the new covid wave snuck up on me. Daß Wölf 14:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. Hope everything turns out fine covid-wise. If that library happens to be in Zagreb, I would be interested if you could leaf through a specific book to check if any Croatian Spring-related photographs were published there in 1970 - also making them PD ;) --Tomobe03 (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Niš Declaration
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Niš Declaration you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Niš Declaration
The article Niš Declaration you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Niš Declaration for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corfu Declaration
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corfu Declaration you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corfu Declaration
The article Corfu Declaration you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Corfu Declaration for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Niš Declaration
The article Niš Declaration you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Niš Declaration for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Corfu Declaration
The article Corfu Declaration you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Corfu Declaration for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Copy edit of May Declaration complete
thank you for taking time to copyedit the May Declaration article. I'm confident its quality has been improved. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of May Declaration
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article May Declaration you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of May Declaration
The article May Declaration you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:May Declaration for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of May Declaration
The article May Declaration you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:May Declaration for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Green Cadres
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Green Cadres you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Yugoslavism
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Yugoslavism has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I left a "clarification needed" tag in the  Illyrian contribution to linguistic unity section because one sentence is incomplete. I suspect the correct wording should be "language creates nations", but I'm not certain.

I notice that a non-registered editor changed "Bulgars" to "Bulgarians" in the Background section. Again, I am not sure if this is correct.

Best of luck with the GAR when you get to it. You've clearly done a massive amount of work on the article to improve it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * thank you very much for copyediting the article. I took a quick look at the changes and nothing appears to be problematic. The IP editor was correct to change Bulgars to Bulgarians. I rephrased the bit where you added te clarification needed tag (around Starčević). Could you please take another look at that bit to see if it's any clearer now? Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * That makes sense! The section looks fine now. Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Green Cadres
The article Green Cadres you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Green Cadres for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Spring
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian Spring you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Spring
The article Croatian Spring you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Croatian Spring for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Spring
The article Croatian Spring you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Croatian Spring for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zagreb Resolution
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zagreb Resolution you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zagreb Resolution
The article Zagreb Resolution you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zagreb Resolution for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Corfu Declaration
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Corfu Declaration has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I have added a "clarification needed" tags to the use of one term which is unclear to me. "Entenete" in the Background section does not make clear which countries assisted in Serbia's rescue.

Best of luck with the article moving forward.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

thank you very much!--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zagreb Resolution
The article Zagreb Resolution you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zagreb Resolution for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty of London (1915)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Treaty of London (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty of London (1915)
The article Treaty of London (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Treaty of London (1915) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Pero Pirker
Hi, I've finally added my text about 1964 Zagreb flood and a short bio of Pero Pirker. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find out much about Pirker's role in the Croatian Spring online and I don't know what the authoritative sources are. Since you've nominated Croatian Spring for FAC, I was hoping if you knew more or could fact-check the existing info in that section of his article. I'll gladly share the DYK credit :)

P.S. Unfortunately I never got around to checking that source I mentioned the last time. I was going to visit the Starčevićev trg library and check your book while I'm at it when the covid cases thinned out a bit, but it doesn't seem like that's about to happen any time soon, so I just published what I've got. Daß Wölf 03:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * No problem, I'll take a look later today.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Croatian Spring on OTD
Hi, and thanks for adding Croatian Spring to Selected anniversaries/December 1. There's only one problem, which is that the facts described in the blurb do not seem to actually be in the article. I don't see where it says that the purges began on the 1st. "On 1 December, Tito convened a joint meeting of the leaders of the SKJ and the SKH at the Karađorđevo hunting ground in Vojvodina," but it seems that the part that says, "tens of thousands were expelled from the SKH" didn't happen until after 11 December. Also, the infobox says that the Croatian Spring ended on 1 December, but it's not clear in the article how the movement ended on that day. So despite the GA promotion, I think this needs a little bit of work before we can feature it on OTD. Thanks. — howcheng  {chat} 08:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks for pointing this out - a sentence was missing from the article.--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations
Thank you for the kind message... and for patience with the review.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of London (1915)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Your GA nomination of Yugoslavism
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yugoslavism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armistice of Belgrade
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armistice of Belgrade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lipošćak affair
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lipošćak affair you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lipoš?ak affair
The article Lipoš?ak affair you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lipoš?ak affair for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yugoslavism
The article Yugoslavism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yugoslavism for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 15:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lipošćak affair
The article Lipošćak affair you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lipošćak affair for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armistice of Belgrade
The article Armistice of Belgrade you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Armistice of Belgrade for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yugoslavism
The article Yugoslavism you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yugoslavism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Armistice of Belgrade
The article Armistice of Belgrade you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Armistice of Belgrade for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Croatian Spring scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Croatian Spring article has been scheduled as a today's featured article for January 11, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/January 11, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article "about a period in history of Yugoslavia and Croatia marked by a peak in a wider and longer-lasting conflict between centralisation and decentralisation of Yugoslavia. The period saw a rise in Croatian national sentiment and nationalist forces framing their objectives around economic issues of (de)centralisation. At the same time, those advocating decentralisation embraced (to a degree) support from the nationalists. Actions of the leadership of the Socialist Republic of Croatia drew response from Croatian Serbs and caused ethnic tensions. The period ended when the Croatian leadership was removed from power following an intervention by Yugoslav president Josip Broz Tito. Croatian Spring and associated events had a significant impact on the final years of Yugoslavia."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2694 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , thank you very much!--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Vandalisation
Dobra večer. Članak o meni vandaliziran je na engleskome i hrvatskome. Precizno: uneseno je negativno mišljenje koje je o meni u ne baš pristojnoj polemici izrazio Viktor Ivančić i kao izvor navedene su Ivančićeve polemike. Ti dodaci su uneseni posve anonimno, samo s IP brojem, s mobilnog telefona. Budući da je članak o meni, ne bih htio sam intervenirati. Što mi savjetujete? Unaprijed hvala. --Inoslav Bešker (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Surrender of RSK 21st Krajina Corps to Croatian Army, Glina, Croatia, 8 August 1995.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Surrender of RSK 21st Krajina Corps to Croatian Army, Glina, Croatia, 8 August 1995.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:32, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Re: Severin County
I'm not sure. Seeding red links in hatnotes is not accepted practice, cf. WP:REDHAT. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 12:27, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me to try to establish a continuity over so many decades and different political systems inbetween. See if you can have a general summary article about the old counties, or just make stubs if they have any potential. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There's already an article for Modruš-Rijeka County... --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, I just realized you said latter in reference to that. The words were transposed, that threw me off. Yeah, I guess those two short periods can start of as a background section of that article. It's somewhat more appropriate since the context is the same empire. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Geneva Declaration (1918)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Geneva Declaration (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Geneva Declaration (1918)
The article Geneva Declaration (1918) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Geneva Declaration (1918) and Talk:Geneva Declaration (1918)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Operation Flash picture
Hello,

Can I use this non-free picture of Croatian Army in Operation Flash which you uploaded on Wikipedia for the article Military history of Croatia?

I am very surprised to see that we have very few pictures of Croatian Army in Croatian War of Independence on Commons in comparrison with all the other Croatian wars in history, despite the fact that this conflict is relatively recent.

Franjo Tahy (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi! I'm afraid fair-use rationale would not cover it, thought I'm not 100% sure on this. Generally, fair-use means a low-res, small image may be used to illustrate the article dealing specifically with the topic shown, i.e. only one article.


 * You are right, there are sadly few PD images from a relatively recent war - while there are plenty high quality images available to the HMDCDR and other publicly funded bodies barred from use by restrictive licensing. I tried arguing with one custodian of a photo library about the issue of over-restrictive licensing (unrelated to the war photos) only to be rebuffed with the argument that "others would use the photos then".--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Geneva Declaration (1918)
The article Geneva Declaration (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geneva Declaration (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:Geneva Declaration (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geneva Declaration (1918)
Hello! Your submission of Geneva Declaration (1918) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Geneva Declaration (1918)
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Yugoslav!
Hi!

You wrote several excellent articles on Yugoslav-related subjects, especially the 6th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia. I also presume you are from that geographic area. I've created (or totally revised) on the Central Committee terms of the League of Communists, such as Central Committee of the 6th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia. I am trying to - presently - to create an article about the Central Council of the 1st Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia here.

The reason why I contacted you is that you created the Social Democratic Party of Bosnia–Herzegovina (1909). I am presuming then that you probably have an overview of who attended the KPJ's founding congress or were elected to its central bodies.

If you could help, I would appreciate it. If not, keep up the excellent work! TheUzbek (talk) 10:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your kind words. The best thing I can offer you is Koprivica-Oštrić article on the 1st Congress available online in Croatian (with English summary) here for free. I trust you can use machine translation tools on the text if necessary. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1918 protest in Zagreb
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1918 protest in Zagreb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 07:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1918 protest in Zagreb
The article 1918 protest in Zagreb you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1918 protest in Zagreb for comments about the article, and Talk:1918 protest in Zagreb/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:58, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023
  Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter • A New Future for Road Articles Online  Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * Features
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of  Imzadi 1979  →  on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

1918 occupation of Međimurje
Thanks for taking up this copyedit. I'll keep track of the article (and its talk) if you need any clarification. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk) 04:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries; I didn't enounter any problems during my c/e. Good luck with your planned GA nom and cheers,  Baffle☿gab  00:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1918 occupation of Međimurje
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1918 occupation of Međimurje you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1918 occupation of Međimurje
The article 1918 occupation of Međimurje you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1918 occupation of Međimurje for comments about the article, and Talk:1918 occupation of Međimurje/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Requested GOCE copy edit of Treaty of Rapallo (1920)

 * Thank you very much for taking time to improve this article's prose. I'll review the changes and check back with you if I have any questions afterwards. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I was going to mention that "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes" gets repeated too often, but I abandoned my mental attempts at a short form, say "Serbia", for fear of its being wrong for some reason, such as slighting the other ethnicities or glossing over its monarchical nature. Dhtwiki (talk) 03:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * A commonly used solution here on wiki is "Kingdom SCS" or "KSCS". Shortening to "Serbia" is incorrect - that's a different country. The problem of impractical name was present in the country at the time also and it was more or less commonly referred to as "Yugoslavia" until it was formally renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929 - a name proposed for the country back in late 1918 (by the Yugoslav Committee representatives), but avoided at insistence of the Kingdom of Serbia as a means to keep the name of Serbia in the name of the new country. How about having at the first occurrence of the name in the body text "Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (KSCS)" and using the acronym later on?--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Janko Drašković
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Janko Drašković you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 07:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion
thank you for taking time to copyedit this article. I had a look at the edits and only made some minor corrections of typos. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Janko Drašković
The article Janko Drašković you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Janko Drašković for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Tang campaign against Kucha
Tang campaign against Kucha has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of D401 road for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D401 road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/D401 road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JMWt (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion
The article 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion and Talk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 03:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Tomobe03, just reminding you about this GAN. If there is no response in a few days I'll close this as unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, . Sorry for the wait, I was on the road past 7 days. I plan to address the issues you raised today and tomorrow. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion
The article 1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion for comments about the article, and Talk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 02:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty of Rapallo (1920)
The article Treaty of Rapallo (1920) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920) and Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThaesOfereode -- ThaesOfereode (talk) 02:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Treaty of Rapallo (1920)
The article Treaty of Rapallo (1920) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920) for comments about the article, and Talk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ThaesOfereode -- ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)