User talk:Tompw/archive4

Image:GBR_rail_passenegers_by_year.gif dataset
Hello Tompw. I was looking your graph of passenger numbers over time. Do you still have the spreadsheet with the numbers in so that it can be regenerated in a vector format. The spreadsheet is also the "source code" of the graph and should allow easy re-creation when more years of data become available. (Soon it looks like passenger numbers may exceed those in the 1950s blip! Many thanks. —Sladen (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I put the dataset on the image page. Journeys for 2007/07 (labelled as 2007) were the highest since 1946... there was a big jump of 7.6%, taking things well above the 1950s bump. I also have data for passenger-km if you think that would be useful graph to have. (The data for that only goes back to 1946... 2006/7 saw 46.5bn, the hoghest since 1946's record of 47.0). Tom pw (talk) (review) 19:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Formula One
Thanks for your work on automating the transition of selected articles and pictures!-- Diniz (talk) 17:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

FCDW/March 31, 2008
Tom, that article is ready for publication, was written by someone else, and your changes aren't improving it. Did MER-C ask you to work on it? Sandy Georgia (Talk) 19:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm worried that he mentioned that he's offline, and you're introducing a lot of typos, significant changes, and grammatical errors. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 19:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Portals
I've added Algebra and Topology to Portal:Contents/Portals. Nice work on those :) -- Quiddity (talk) 20:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Maths portals
I responded on my talk page. I also created Portal:Number theory and Portal:Discrete mathematics. I transferred some selected articles from topology to discrete mathematics. Since the number of portals grow, we'll have to modify Portal:Mathematics/RelatedPortals, maybe this way ? Cenarium Talk 13:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem with overlaps, it also depends on the number of selectable articles in topology. You can work on number theory too. I'm not very experienced in templates, I created Portal:Number theory/Topics based on Portal:Set theory/Topics, and I'd like to link List of number theory topics. I think that Portal:Mathematics/RelatedPortals is nice like this. I'm not sure that the tab-based system can be implemented in a portal. Cenarium  Talk 14:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I changed the background colour of Portal:Category theory/box-header. I'd like to keep blue-based colours for category theory. Change the colours of Number Theory and Discrete as you like. Cenarium  Talk 17:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I changed the colours of category theory. Yeah, I like category theory and logic, but topology and algebra also, mathematical physics is interesting. I'm not specialized yet. Cenarium  Talk 18:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hey, Tompw. I don't know whether you are much into projects outside of Wikipedia, but I'd like to hear your input on the formation of Wikimedia Canada before we end up locking the bylaws for submission in a few weeks. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Tompw/bookshelf
Kudos to you for User:Tompw/bookshelf ... truly excellent magic. But you don't appear to consider the size implications of images, nor do you have a note noting this. I'm sure you've thought about the image issue, but tell me: we can presumably make an assumption or stipulation about the print size of images, but do we have a clue about the average number of images per article? And is it worth the candle to go in this direction & recalculate the size including images? --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of acquisitions by Cisco Systems
I have addressed to your concerns. Gary King ( talk ) 17:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria
Could do with an experienced head here. Two editors trying their best don't make a community. I'd appreciate if you could participate and help formulate our new criteria. Colin°Talk 22:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of National Football League team season lists
I have nominated National Football League team season lists, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/National Football League team season lists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Buc (talk) 20:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD
List of Newfoundland and Labrador general elections was selected as a WP:LOTD for one day in June and will be the LOTD during the month. Let me know before May 23rd if you have any date preferences.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

A Featured List contest
Grettings. FL directors Scorpion0422 and The Rambling Man have decided to run a contest for FL contributors. We are trying to get some interest in the process and get some FLs for the under-represented topics. If you would like to learn more about this contest, you can find such information here. If you are uninterested in it, then you could still help out by reviewing FLCs submitted by the entrants. Thanks for the time, Scorpion0422 18:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD/WP:LOTM
Congratulations Canadian federal election results since 1867 has been selected as a July WP:LOTD. As one of the leading vote-getters, it will appear in the WP:LOTD template for two days as a LOTD. If you have any preference on a days during July let me know before June 24th. If you have any other lists that you feel should be nominated next month please ad them at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200808.

Timeline of Canadian elections has also been selected and will appear once. Any date preference should be stated before the 24th for this one as well.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

History of rail transport in Great Britain
Hi, I notice you haven't made many edits in the last week, though there have been some. I've placed the History of rail transport in Great Britain GA nomination on hold. Peanut4 (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Featured topic box
Hi, I am using Template:Featured topic box in 2008 main page redesign proposal/MindstormsKid (in the bottom hidden part). However, it seems that the is messing it up. Can you help me fix it? Thanks! ≈  Mi nd st or ms Kid  02:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

FT Box
I want the top to align with the tops of the other boxes (F Portal and F List). It seems that the is messing it up...

Sorry for the late reply. ≈  Mi nd st or ms Kid  14:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, can I get some feedback here?
Thanks, rst20xx (talk) 20:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

County Lists
Chris is fine. Why haven't some of the mostly complete lists, like Iowa, been nominated? Le comte de monte christo (talk) 11:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Cricket history
Template:Cricket history has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. BlackJack | talk page 15:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:12TeamBracket2
A tag has been placed on Template:12TeamBracket2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

editprotected request on Template:Infobox U.S. County
Just wanted to let you know your request is done. Great idea btw. Cheers. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 04:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Canadian election timelines featured topic
Due to a change in the featured topic criteria, the Canadian election timelines featured topic has 3 months to satisfy criterion 3.c. by getting a peer review done for the audited article in the topic: List of Nunavut general elections. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Formula One Grands Prix
Thanks, but i think maybe similar info is already in these articles? Will (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Congressional districts of Arkansas
Arkansas' is not grammatically correct. 1) An apostrophe has no pronunciation, so "Arkansas' districts" is pronounced the same as "Arkansaw districts." (Arkansaw to reflect the odd pronunciation of the name). That is wrong. To be pronounced "Arkansaw's districts" there must be an additional s. There is no difference what letter the noun ends with.  Follow the very simple rule of possessives: when making any singular noun possessive, add an apostrophe-s; when  making a plural noun that already end in s possessive, simply add an apostrophe.  For irregular plurals that do not end in s, add an apostrophe-s.  These are singular nouns and should always add an apostrophe-s.  It is better to write Mr. Jones's (Joneses) rather than Mr. Jones' (Jones); the latter is still accepted because it phonetically makes sense as the s in the word is already pronounced, unlike Arkansas, but the the former is better because it is more clear. 2) The only times that you may leave off the s are for Biblical or Classical names such as Jesus' and Moses'. The only exceptions are historical, which I disagree with but is generally accepted. 3) To be correctly consistent with with other articles. We have Texas's 1st congressional district and Kansas's congressional districts, which both need the additional s because the final s is pronounced differently, and because of the rule of possessives. 5) Per WP:MOS, please do not change widely accepted, pre-set styles without a reason. 6) Per WP:MOS, including the extra s is correct. In short, they are correct with the additional s, although they are often incorrectly accepted without it, and there is no need to move an established name. Thanks for understanding and happy editing,  Reywas92 Talk  23:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Massachusetts's is correct, but because the s is pronounced, unlike Texas and the others, Massachusetts' is considered acceptable. Thanks,   Reywas92 Talk  15:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Congressional districts in county infoboxes
Hi, Tompw. Over at Template talk:Infobox U.S. County, you told me to come find you if you hadn't worked on adding districts 4 through 18 to the box template (or made your unspecified tweaks do districts 1 through 3). I'm in no hurry on my portion of this project (adding the districts to specific counties' infoboxes&mdash;I've done only CT, HI, RI, and some of GA so far), but I thought I'd send you a reminder. :) Thanks for your efforts on this! Qqqqqq (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

HEEEELP
Hi, Tompw. i`m mohamed salim an editor in Arabic Wikipedia and i`m an expert in aviation. i need ur help in Template:Random portal component. the template was copied to arabic wiki from a while, but no body use it cuz it don`t work. when i write the tempelate on the portal, and press preview it show that there is an extra [. i check the template but there was no extra [.

the template in arabic wiki is ar:قالب:مكون بوابة عشوائية and u can try it on the aviation portal in selected pic section.

selected pic means in arabic صورة مختارة, the pages i think u need are :
 * the pic gallary : ar:بوابة:طيران/صورة مختارة/أرشيف
 * the aviation portal : ar:بوابة:طيران

if u help that would be nice from u !!

thx --محــ سالم ــمد نشوان (talk) 11:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

broken image link
this link http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/ecard/certificate/reprint.php?insertedIDreprint=41436 appears to be broken —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.107.188.38 (talk) 21:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

FAQ for Template:Major UK railway stations
Hi, I've noticed you've contributed to Template talk:Major UK railway stations and would like to ask you if you'd like to get involved with creating an FAQ for the page. It's currently in My Sandbox 2. Do you think anything can be added, or is inaccurate so should be removed or reworded? I'd welcome your feedback on my Talk Page rather than direct edits to the template. Many thanks Welshleprechaun (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please go to Template talk:Major UK railway stations for a "discussion" on it being renamed. Hammersfan 03/02/09, 13.01 GMT

Error in User:Tompw/bookshelf?
Hi, I think I found a small error on your bookshelf page. When volumes is n*200+x for 1000.5 or <0.5). I suggest the following fix: Replace the string above by: ( (-100)/200 round 0 ) This fixes the problem. See as examples broken, fixed, diff. Thanks, --Church of emacs (Talk) 13:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Formula One/Constructors
Can I ask why this big block of links is really necessary on the portal? It takes up a lot of room on my screen, and frankly seems a little redundant. It also puts the columns fairly out of whack. Aptery gial  22:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

four color theorem
You made a comment a long time ago, that four color theorem ought to be nominated for FA. Unfortunately, the standards are way higher now, so I don't know if you would still think that, but would you be interested in helping it through a nomination?

There's also currently an A-class review underway: WikiProject_Mathematics/A-class_rating/Four_color_theorem. --C S (talk) 03:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Translated graphs
Hello there Tompw,

The French-language Wikipedia articles concerning election results in Canada lack something comparable to the good graphs you have done in English. I propose to help you translate them all into French. I see three ways to proceed: 1) we could translate the captions, giving us a pair of images in each case, 2) we could "bilingualize" the captions or 3) we could take the captions out. I would advise the third option, since the captions can easily be placed outside the image (and in fact they are in every single case at the moment) and this option would require the least amount of effort on your part. Also, if you do not have the time right now, I could take your Excel sheets and do it myself. I do not have Ms Excel, but most likely OpenOffice Calc will allow me to do something close if not identical.

Thanks! -- Mathieugp (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the time to reply to me. The interim measure you are proposing sounds good! Whenever you have time! -- Mathieugp (talk) 00:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

List of counties in Alabama
Thanks for noticing. The only weak point right now is the referencing in the lead. There are a lot of statements about history that aren't quite fully covered by the sparse in-line citations included. Would be happy to have either you or me nominate it (don't really care so long as it gets FL) but would like to take care of that first. Say a day or two to find the sources? Geraldk (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind, got to the referencing sooner than I thought. Go ahead and nominate it whenever you are ready. Geraldk (talk) 20:36, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Presto card
Hi there,

Regarding your question on File:PRESTO card.png;

I welcome any suggestions on how to better update the permissions for this file. I work for PRESTO and have been asked to update the Wikipedia page on it. I am very new to working with Wikipedia and greatly appreciate any suggestions. I would like to make the page as accurate as possible.

The image in question is the property of PRESTO and is free to be published. However, it is not available online; only in our files here at the office. Please let me know of any suggestions you may have.

PRESTO card (talk) 14:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

St Catherines and Niagara Falls station.
When you edit the rail templates, you need to reverse the order for VIA Corridor and Amtrak Maple Leafs line or the template will not display correctly. SYSS Mouse (talk) 21:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Another Tompw/bookshelf question: Sanity check
I brought up an issue with the sanity check at User talk:Tompw/bookshelf. I thought I'd let you know in case you haven't seen it. Rl (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox GB station
You might wish to note my recent edits and comment here. Regards. Adambro (talk) 14:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * On a related issue regarding Category:British railway stations opened in 1829 as an example, it might be better to use the format Category:Railway stations in the United Kingdom opened in 1829 for consistency with Category:Railway stations in the United Kingdom. British railway stations is a bit awkward and doesn't really fit nicely within the existing category structure. In the fomat Category:Railway stations in the United Kingdom opened in 1829, each category could go in a new Category:Railway stations in the United Kingdom by year of establishment (for consistency with Category:Railway stations by year of establishment) and Category:Railway stations opened in 1829.
 * I would welcome your thoughts on this, and I'd be happy to work with you to change this if you agreed. Adambro (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Replied on template talk page Tom pw (talk) (review) 15:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Editor review
If you want one i would advise that you start a new one as this was was archived years ago! With current editing patterns and changes to yourself and to Wikipedia, it may be good to look at how you are doing now rather than how you were doing up until 2 1/2 years ago.

On a separate note, do you know what i going to happen with the infobox? Simply south (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Countyrow template
As the creator of the Countyrow template, I thought you might be able to help out. A reviewer at Featured list candidates/List of counties in Florida/archive2 has pointed out a couple of things that could be improved with it. I was unable to figure out how to make these changes, and was wondering if you could take a look. Thanks,  Jujutacular  T · C 21:41, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll make thchnages, but before Friday. Tom pw (talk) (review) 02:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * User:Arsenikk took care of the changes, thank you anyway.  Jujutacular  T · C 19:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

FTRC
I have Canadian election timelines up for FTRC here. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:County7
Template:County7 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:English football league system cells
Template:English football league system cells has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Featured topic removal candidates/Canadian election timelines/archive1
Your input is needed here on where to proceed with this now that the FLC has failed. I know you haven't been editing much but get to this quickly if you can. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:44, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

List of Nunavut general elections
I think the best way of expanding the lead would be to offer some interesting facts on those who have been elected. Things like the total number of people elected, legislators who have won multiple terms, and the two men who have won in all three elections would all be nice additions. They would provide a nice summary of what is actually in the list, not to mention that you could probably get another paragraph out of them. If there is anything noteworthy about any of the elections in particular, it would also be a good candidate to be discussed in the lead.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 21:53, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

List of Nunavut general elections
Hello there. I've noticed that you need this article to get to FL status. Is there anything that I can do to help you out? It would be a shame to see this FT go down just because of this one article you know?-- White Shadows There goes another day 00:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok so I've expanded the lead a bit but I have an idea. Why not take the notes at the bottom and add yhem to the lead instead? That would make the lead long enough to make it a FL candidate.-- White Shadows I ran away from you 16:17, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that it's ready for another FLC!-- White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 16:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Like I said, feel free to ping me if you're up for it :)-- White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 22:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:West Midlands Two
Template:West Midlands Two has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:31, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

meta.wikimedia/Wikipedia_as_books
Hi, i really appreciate your bookshelf template, but i think there is something wrong on meta.wikimedia/Wikipedia_as_books. The text above the person says 5718 volumes in 29 stacks. Next to him are only 2200 volumes in 11 stacks. This is quite a difference, or did I get something wrong? Thanks Jahobr (talk) 15:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

FLRC
nominated Wilco discography for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Afro ( Talk ) 05:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Reading to Plymouth Line
After several years of discussion the consensus was to split the Reading to Plymouth Line article into three articles - Bristol to Exeter line, Reading to Taunton line, and Exeter to Plymouth line. The split has now been done, though fairly crudely as I am not an expert on the subject. It will need an expert eye to look at it and smooth out the edges.  SilkTork  *YES! 15:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Featured list removal candidates/List of Alberta general elections/archive1
Nergaal (talk) 04:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Canada_federal_elections.PNG update for 2011?
Hey, do you think you could update the File:Canada_federal_elections.PNG to reflect the 2011 election reesults?

Also, if you do, would you consider somehow differentiating the old Conservative/PC party from the current Conservatives in the colour scheme? They're not the same party.  C üRly T üRkey  Talk Contribs 01:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

FYI, featured portal drive
Hi there, Tompw, you'd previously successfully gotten and nominated one of the portals linked from the top-right of the Main Page to Featured Portal quality status rating, so I'm notifying you about this featured portal drive, please see: Wikipedia_talk:Portal. Your help/contribution would be most appreciated! Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikigrow2.GIF listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikigrow2.GIF, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Missing stack in User:Tompw/bookshelf, Size in volumes etc.
I believe the number of stacks in the various "how big is Wiki in printed books" graphics is missing a stack. It's currently 1634 volumes, which should be eight full stacks, plus a partial ninth stack. It's displaying seven full stacks plus a partial eighth. I believe the problem is with the calculation in User:Tompw/bookshelf/stacks. It's currently:

&#123;&#123; #expr: &#123;&#123;User:Tompw/bookshelf/volumes&#125;&#125;/200 round 0&#125;&#125;

It should probably be something like

&#123;&#123; #expr: ceil(&#123;&#123;User:Tompw/bookshelf/volumes&#125;&#125;/200)&#125;&#125;

(I think I did the conversion of braces correctly, but if the above has ended up with a missing or extra brace, I apologize in advance.)

The round function is not what you'd really want. Round would convert 300-499 books (1.500 to 2.495 stacks) to 2, and 500-699 books (2.500 to 3.495 stacks) to 3. Ceil will get the next highest integer. Thus 1.005 through 2.000 (201-400 books) would get 2, but 2.005 through 3.000 (401-600 books) would get 3.

Likewise, the calculation in User:Tompw/bookshelf/volumes, should probably be changed from:

&#123;&#123;#expr:(&#123;&#123;NUMBEROFARTICLES:R&#125;&#125;/(500*2*2*80*50/(6*562)) round 0) + 1&#125;&#125;

&#123;&#123;#expr:ceil(&#123;&#123;NUMBEROFARTICLES:R}}/(500*2*2*80*50/(6*562)))&#125;&#125;

Although that's only going to be off a book at worst.

I haven't quite traced through how the partial stack gets drawn, so I'm not sure if there's an impact there or not.

Rwessel (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Per the discussion at Help desk/Archives/2012 February 29, I have gone ahead and made the above changes. Rwessel (talk) 03:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:DWJ books


A tag has been placed on Template:DWJ books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ( </tt>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. J36miles (talk) 15:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:New Horizons Liftoff2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:New Horizons Liftoff2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 21:10, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Link to archived video feed would work perfectly (+ info about time of screenshoot). But I that it may be easier to replace this image by one from commons:Category:AV-010 - for example File:Atlas V 551 Lauch with New Horizons.jpg Bulwersator (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bathampton railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rail usage statistics by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FGC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

List of counties in Delaware
I was wondering what to do with this article. Technically a list can not be a Good article. You may want to move it back to Delaware counties. I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates to see if it could be nominated as a list, but it doesn't look too positive. Would be interested in your opinion as you are the main contributor. AIR corn (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it is ready to nominate. I have never done one so you might want to do it. I will help with any fixes that I can. AIR corn (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I will leave it for you. I don't know how much help I can be as i am not overly familiar with the topic (although I went to Delaware once so probably more than many non-Americans). I don't know how it will go, but it looks as good as the other county lists with featured status (the nomination of two in a row might help too). I will delist it before you nominate so it does not get the "but it is a Good article opposes". AIR corn (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

List of counties in West Virginia
Hello- I have nominated List of Counties in West Virginia for Featured List status. While I was updating the list, I of course noted your helpful links on County lists and their criteria for making a FL status. Could you take a look at List_of_counties_in_West_Virginia or its FL page and let me know where I could improve or (gasp) actually support? Many thanks for your attentionCoal town guy (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * GREAT NEWS! I have 2 supports! Look forward to your review and hopeful support!Coal town guy (talk) 03:33, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Bowness, Forest Lawn and Montgomery
Hi Tompw, I have started a discussion here about splitting the respective neighbourhood articles for the above into separate articles for the neighbourhoods and for the former towns. Looking at histories, it was you who moved Bowness, Alberta to Bowness, Calgary. Your consideration and input would be appreciated. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

RFC at List of Israeli cities
There's a RFC at to talk:List of Israeli cities about weather the articles inclusion of Israeli settlements (with city status) as "Israeli cities" in this context original research, or otherwise problematic. I'm telling you this because you were a participant at Featured list candidates/List of Israeli cities where, by my understanding, it was decided to call them "Israeli cities" and the purpose of the RFC is to review that decision. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BHAOstop
Template:BHAOstop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Dream out loud (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank-you for telling this template was up for deletion. I've commented at the discussion. Tom pw (talk) (review) 01:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎
You are invited to join Commons:Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎. Useddenim (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

xkcd & User:Tompw
Randall mentions you here. Congrats! Rgrds. --69.95.203.144 (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Ooh, thanks! That's made my day! Tom pw (talk) (review) 16:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wyle railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wylye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hannington railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hannington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=572082745 your edit] to Union Pearson Express may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * org/5wrZIanHt |archivedate=1 March 2011}} . This was later expanded to 18 DMU cars Adding one car to each train  via an option order. This brought the a cost to US$75 million.<ref name="

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:BC elections2.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Chant coloured.GIF, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your help desk question
I have attempted a response.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Asked a Q here
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=614918699 your edit] to List of high-speed trains may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ
Category:Boardwalk Hall Auditorium Organ, which you created, has been nominated for dual upmerging to Category:Music of New Jersey and Category:Culture of Atlantic City, New Jersey. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 04:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: WOOOOOOOOOO
I'm not sure if this is a bug, but it's not showing up for me when I go to the redirects for discussion page. And yes, I've tried clearing my cache. Carrot official (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Do I need to add it to the RfD page manually, or should it show up automatically? Carrot official (talk) 04:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

That was why I marked it for discussion in the first place. Also, I'm a little bit new here, so thanks for letting me know. :) Carrot official (talk) 04:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Is there a shorthand for a template for an RfD entry? (Similar to four tildes on a talk page) Carrot official (talk) 04:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

review
Hi. You left me a message saying you reviewed the page on Johnnie L. Cochran middle school. Immediately after that, it was aggressively attacked by a few users saying that middle schools are rarely notable. The article is gone and the name was redirected back to the school district. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnnie_L._Cochran_Jr._Middle_School&oldid=750732652)

As you didn't make that comment when you reviewed the page, I am wondering how all this works. Are they correct? Or is this all just opinion? Any insight you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Phatnblak (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1930


The article New Brunswick general election, 1930 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1925


The article New Brunswick general election, 1925 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1917


The article New Brunswick general election, 1917 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1912


The article New Brunswick general election, 1912 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1908


The article New Brunswick general election, 1908 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1903


The article New Brunswick general election, 1903 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1899


The article New Brunswick general election, 1899 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, ''xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1895


The article New Brunswick general election, 1895 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, ''xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1890


The article New Brunswick general election, 1890 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, ''xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1882


The article New Brunswick general election, 1882 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, ''xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1878


The article New Brunswick general election, 1878 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, ''xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Brunswick general election, 1870


The article New Brunswick general election, 1870 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Series of articles New Brunswick general election, ''xxxx without references for ten years. WP:BEFORE failed to turn anything up. Fails WP:V. No references, no article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)