User talk:Tomsmith26559

Welcome!

Hello, Tomsmith26559, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sudhir S. Raval, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 16:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir S. Raval


A tag has been placed on Sudhir S. Raval requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 16:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

==Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir S. Raval==

A tag has been placed on Sudhir S. Raval requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tomsmith26559 (talk) 17:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
I need to offer you some advice.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. There  needs to be at least one such reference at the very first edit for biographies of living people It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. The material you added, though apparently just the beginning of a long article, was unmistakably promotional, and I deleted it as such. Don't use fancy rhetoric to get us interested in the subject. Just describe in plain language who he is and what he has done, all of it supported by good references. When you write the biographical portion, we care about him, and not his family and especially his ancestors. We want to know where he went to school and what degrees he earned, but we don't want the details of what may have inspired his career.

When it comes to his career, we want to know what he has accomplished, not his ideals, and not what he hopes to accomplish. It is relatively difficult to show notable for a journalist, because people do not usually write about them. If he has published any actual books, beyond his individual pieces of journalism, give the details, and list published reviews of them. If he haswon any awards at a national level, say so, and give references to sources proving it. Without books or awards, it is likely to be difficult to provide the necessary sources for notability, but there is no reason not to try, if you have some sort of reasonable published sources. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive. And remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity.

For further information see our WP:BIO about the requirements for notability,  and also WP:FIRST.  DGG ( talk ) 07:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)