User talk:Tomtom33

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Bidgee (talk) 06:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Griffith Central
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Bidgee (talk) 05:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Griffith Central. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Griffith Central, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bidgee (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked your account. A look at your limited edit history shows that since 2008 you have been returning periodically to resume edit warring over the Griffith Central article and trying to enforce your preferred version of the page. This is unacceptable and violates Wikipedia's editing and behavioural policies. I see on this page that you've been asked repeatedly to stop but continue regardless, refusing to engage in discussion. Wikipedia operates on a foundation of consensus so communication is mandatory, not an optional extra for editing our articles. Additionally, we have policies such as the 3 revert rule which prohibit the kind of editing you are doing and your content edits violate the verifiability and reliable sources rules. I cannot allow you to continue editing our articles in this manner, so you have now been blocked. Please understand that Wikipedia is a privately owned website with a range of rules and editing here isn't a right but a privilege which we reserve the right to revoke once someone shows themselves unwilling to follow the rules and unwilling to engage with other editors. Sarah 12:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * In regards to this, I never said it wasn't reliable, it wasn't verifiable. While the Area News is Griffith local newspaper and could be classified as reliable but since it doesn't cite an article/news story it is not a verifiable nor really is it a reliable source. Bidgee (talk) 13:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)