User talk:Tomwiehl

Speedy deletion of Evan wiehl
A tag has been placed on Evan wiehl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Insanity Incarnat  e  05:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Photo 122.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Photo 122.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Photo 122.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Photo 122.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Lucinda Bliss has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Enigma  message 07:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lucinda Bliss. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lucinda Bliss was changed by Tomwiehl (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-29T07:10:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lucinda Bliss. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Enigma  message 07:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Enigma  message 07:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

{{subst:idw-pui|Lauren.jpg}

Proposed deletion of Lauren Cohen (painter)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lauren Cohen (painter), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No verifiable notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Lauren Cohen (painter)
I have nominated Lauren Cohen (painter), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lauren Cohen (painter). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scott Mac (Doc) 10:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)