User talk:Tomyescribano

[]

Hi.

I saw a big mistake in the photo of this article that may produce confusion to those who might look for how a real nymphaea caerulea really is.

The photo used is a commercial hybrid called and registed as nymphaea "Islamorada", created by Florida Aquatic Nurseries 1999. It's not a pure species like nymphaea caerulea.

I include some links showing my point.

http://www.internationalwaterlilycollection.com/?project=nymphaea-islamorada

http://www.floridaaquatic.com/waterlily_islamorada.html

However in other languages of Wikipedia the photo is correct ...like this one : []

http://www.internationalwaterlilycollection.com/?project=nymphaea-caerulea-savigny

http://www.victoria-adventure.org/waterlilies/species_galleries/brachyceras_caerulea.html

I hope someone correct the mistake.... Thanks.

Tomás Escribano Blázquez (member of EWLA (European Waterlily and Lotuses Association ) https://waterlily-lotus.eu/