User talk:Tonedeaf1/sandbox

The www.metro.net web pages are not valid resources, despite being part of a public utility. The management, decision-making execs obviously have other interests or capabilities than to enforce minimal corrective action for the information. I dep[end on public transit and welcome the ststion informaion placed on wikipedia. The only station in Italy, France, or the UK I've been at, without any identificaton, much less a map with train scheduling or destnations, is a Metrolink station in Northridge, CA, on the "what" line? I found from my hospitals' page, for another, there's a shuttle from theblue lines' Willowbrook station. But please show me any www.metro.net information for either blue line or Willowbrook/ Rosa Parks. Those suits should goback to Edison or P.G.&E. or whatever got them cushy places in the suburbs to start with and get out of public service. We have Gloria Molina appointing her friends and their associates already. I guess, wrongly, that the billions spent by L.A. County on this and that were provided for a select few to grab cash without restrictions on ethics or morals. But that's how it's working out. They must be sitting in their ivory towers laughing at those stupid, poor people who actually need to use public transport.Silence leads to vice, but somehow our county pays people to be silent accomplices. The metro system here means billions in taxpayer money.But our online information is a big fat joke. Try www.511.org, for a similar website in the San Francisco area to compare the good and bad. At least the schedule pdf download problem, previously 45 mins on a T1 connection, has been solved after 20 years. Tonedeaf1 (talk) 19:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)