User talk:Tonim 007

Nomination of Meghna Alam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meghna Alam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meghna Alam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Meghna Alam is Suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. It follows all the rules and regulations of Wikipedia Tonim 007 (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghna Alam, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Final warning
Stop attempting to subvert the AFD by speedily deleting the article. Let it run. This is the last warning about it. Praxidicae (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * This is your absolute last warning, you're maliciously nominating articles for speedy deletion and AFD, it's total nonsense. Cut it out. If you do so again, I will request an indefinite block on your account. Praxidicae (talk) 16:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macheboeuf


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macheboeuf, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly doing so may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

AfD
Hi Tonim 007. Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia's deletion process. I see that you are relatively new to Wikipedia as an editor—we welcome your contributions, but unfortunately, at this time I would like to ask that you please slow down. Your recent deletion nominations, such as Articles for deletion/Macheboeuf and Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Galván Castillo, seem to lack the amount of preparation we typically expect before a nomination. If you have questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page. You can also visit the Teahouse, which is a Q&A forum designed specifically for new editors. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 04:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Khaleda Zia, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 15:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rezwan Karim


A tag has been placed on Rezwan Karim, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Acacacacczc (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Grayfell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Non-fungible token have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)