User talk:TonioBonecci

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you are interested in posting news events, please feel free to check out Wikinews. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Tonio. The article appeared to be taken from another source, making it a violation of copyright. Second, it appeared to deal with a current event which would better be served at Wikinews. Something like that is simply not suited for an encyclopedia. Thanks. PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Whoa, time out a moment. Your user page was a duplicate of the article you posted.  That falls under the potential copyright violation plus it's a misuse of your user page.  That page is designed to tell a bit about yourself and your activities here.  Please don't come here slinging accusations of personal attacks as I did no such thing.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You didn't do anything to offend me. I took no offense at your page.  One of my tasks as an administrator is to delete improper new pages.  You haven't done anything wrong and you're certainly welcome to edit this site, but please don't get off on the wrong foot.  Thanks again.  PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Let's put a stop to this before it spins out of control. Before a new user begins adding new content, it is up to him/her to review the rules. If for some reason the content is inadmissable, an administrator can delete it with no warning and leave word that the content had been deleted. My suggestion would be to review WP:YFA and WP:CIVIL. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Please note, also, that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: a compendium of information about notable topics, properly sourced. It has no place for press releases, media publicity stunts, or efforts to create a stir where one does not already exist. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, Mike. Listen: You came here and posted something inappropriate and I clearly stated why it was deleted. You have since taken to accusing me of personal attacks and are crying foul for no reason whatsoever. I have beeen polite and patient in trying to assist you and once more you accuse me of something I haven't done. I should tell you in all fairness that if you are here to participate in the manner expected of all users, I sincerely welcome you to the project. If you insist on your present course of action, I will have no choice but to block you from editing. PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Tonio, please calm down. Having a page deleted isn't the end of the world, and there's no reason to be so incivil towards PMDrive. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)