User talk:Tonkinesekitten

Image copyright problem with Image:Picture 0001.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Picture 0001.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Veronica Ballestrini
A tag has been placed on Veronica Ballestrini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jons63 (talk) 00:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. CardinalDan (talk) 18:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  Acroterion  (talk)  18:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Mandy Jiroux
A tag has been placed on Mandy Jiroux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 19:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Picture to Burn music video.jpg
This image appears to be a frame or screen shot from a music video. Where did you get the image? If it is from a music video, there is a SERIOUS copyright problem. If you took the picture yourself at a concert or public event, it is probably OK. A screen shot of a music video is a derivative work of the music video. You cannot release a derivative of a copyrighted work into the public domain unless (1) you hold the music video copyright OR (2) you have permission of the copyright holder!

If this is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you can use a non-free media license AND a detailed fair use rationale. Sehome Bay Leave a message 18:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)