User talk:Tonmoy0013

May 2019
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. &#x222F; WBG converse 06:10, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * We are not your university-brochure. &#x222F; WBG converse 06:11, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. &#x222F; WBG converse 06:56, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:05, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Article protected
Please try to gain consensus for your changes on the article talk page. But at a glance, much of your additions appear too promotional to merit encyclopedic inclusion. El_C 07:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Datta High School, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)