User talk:TonyClarke

Dear Tony; Hi! Welcome to the 'pedia. I hope you like it and enjoy it enough to contribute your great knowledge into our site continuously. Im honored to be the first one giving you a welcome, as usually administrators have the honor, not collaborators like me.

As a matter of a fact I do not follow the diet. I have diabetes and so well I dont even follow the diabetes diet to tell you the truth..LOL But I found your article interesting and knowledge enhancing.

I see you are from Scotland. Beautiful country. Check my article on Ken Buchanan. No doubt one of the greatest boxers from Europe, and I thought he deserved an entry here,. What happened to him as champion I think makes his life story a compelling one.

Well, Tony thats all for now. Tha nks for everything and God bless you!!

Sincerely yours, Antonio Lets get WIIILDD!! Martin

Hi Antonio, thanks for the warm welcome.

You have written a lot, I'll look up Ken Buchanan,sounds interesting. You probably don't need me to tell you you should consider a diet, the Fuhrman one is the best I have found. I know it's not easy socially or motivationally, but hey God will probably thank you for looking after that body he lent you..

I don't know if this is the right plavce to answer your note, thanks again, and no doubt we will speak again.

Tony TonyClarke 18:23 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)

A picture of a big cat is needed, but are you sure you're allowed to use this particular picture on Wikipedia? If you got it off a Club Med web page, one would normally assume that Club Med or someone else have the copyright, which means you'll have to have explicit permission to use it elsewhere. If you got that, there should be a reference to it on the image page: Image:ClubMed.jpg. Egil 12:30 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)

No you're right I didn't havepermission and looks like I needed it so I'll remove it. Any idea how to search for copyright free images? TonyClarke 12:51 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)


 * Very good question, indeed. And I don't have a very good answer. Searching your own photo album is the best place, obviously. Things funded directly by the US government, such as NASA, are often free to use. For other stuff, is certainly does not hurt asking. See Boilerplate request for permission. PS: I think you need to put the Club Med image up on the Votes for deletion. -- Egil 13:20 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)


 * See also Public domain image resources. -- Egil 22:17 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)


 * Thanks Egil, I'll check these out

TonyClarke 22:30 Apr 26, 2003 (UTC)

- Hey, TC... we're taking issue with your bits on enzymes and digestion in Enzyme. Come rant at us on Talk:Enzyme. Graft

- I edited your user page to disambiguate the link to Python programming language. Hope you don't mind.Tenbaset 05:08 7 Jul 2003 (UTC)

--

thanks Tenbaset, I'm sure that wast the right thing to do, one day I'll understand. TonyClarke 20:13, 3 Aug 2003 (UTC) --

I have re-added links to "secularism" and "humanism" from Jesus Christ, rephrasing their context. My edit summary (see here) explains my reasoning. If you disagree, feel free to remove them again. Cheers, Cyan 00:15, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC) - We already have a page at fast food restaurant. Will fast food have a different content or should it just be a redirect? Rmhermen 14:38, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)

Oops, thanks Rmhermen, we'll need to give this some thought, perhaps a merge is called for, I think the process or movement apprach rather than restaurant approach ismore promising, but the restourant  page certainaly has some interesting and wide ranging content. TonyClarke 21:52, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for the acknowledgement re Genocide. I appreciate the feedback! -- VV 09:42, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)

-

In Is-Ought Problem you used far too many capital letters. I moved it to is-ought problem. It is not conventional in Wikipedia to capitalize common nouns in article titles. Michael Hardy 02:19, 17 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I don't understand why you reverted my edit to sport. I made a concerted effort to avoid deleting any information; what's "gone" from that page is now included in more specific entries such as professional sports and history of sport. You've been doing excellent work. --The Cunctator 00:21, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC) - Thank you for your positive comments about my work.

I feel that the reworking of the article requires justification, and more basically perhaps deserved some explanation or discussion at the time. The absence of either of these led me to think that the reworking was an act of vandalism, whose reversion needed no explaination. Howere, it obviously does need some discussion now.

The article has lost something in being broken up, even though I accept your assurance that all of the original material has been preserved. There is a certain synergy in keeping all of the elements of the article together, e.g. the cumulative evidence in the original article that sport evolved from everyday activities or skills is now lost, as the art and history sections are not now read together by the casual reader. I also think that the History of sport is now less likely to be read, as it is a more specialist subject which is less likely to be looked up, even though it may be an area of question for some readers.

All in all, thank you for the work you did, but unless there is some over-riding Wikipedian policy or principle involved, I would prefer the original article to be re-instated.

TonyClarke 23:23, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Thank you for your very nice note -- I appreciate it. And I hope that you continue to preservere. It can certainly be rather challenging at times! But overall it's not half bad... -- BCorr ¤ &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 04:24, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I agree with your revert of fundamentalism i.e. seeing fundamentalism as a disease. The contributor should at least give example of psychologists. I dislike arguing with these people I have already argued with them on the Dutch version of Fundamentalism. I had asked one week ago examples for this on the Dutch version but I received no reply. Andries 12:46, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Dinghy racing and dinghy sailing
Tony -- I've just seen your cri de coeur about undoing a redirect of dinghy racing to dinghy sailing. I have done it for you (and moved the material), but for future reference, it is quite easy: You just have to find the redirect page and edit that, replacing the redirect line with some real content. There are several ways of finding the redirect page, but the easiest is just to GO to the redirect: you will then get the parent page, but with a line saying "redirected from ..." with the ... as a link; if you click on that link you get the redirect page. seglea 06:30, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Scientific enterprise has moved to its own article
Thank you for your work on scientific enterprise. I moved it, just so you know. Ancheta Wis 10:45, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Nutrition
I read this article awhile ago, but I felt it wasn't written in professional prose. Eg: "It appears that to stay young and live long, we must stay thin!"

Thanks for your comments.

I worded that statement in a deliberately non-technical way, to try to show that a healthy and long life is not necessarily achieved through scientific, academic knowledge, but that it might be a matter of commonsense, i.e. stay thin and don't overeat. Sometimes professionalism can obscure the main picture? Anyway, I'll reread the article, I have thought it had some repetition in it, and maybe some of the language like this needs looked at again.

TonyClarke 00:20, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Torture by proxy
The two references you provided did not seem to function. Please could you check them out and restore them if they work. I would particularly like the quote torture by proxy if it was used in the Times otherwise it ought to be taken out of quotes as it is not used in the Telegraph article which I used as a substitiute

If you have time it would be nice to add the relevent pieces to a section on Uzbekistan to the article Uses of torture in recent times Philip Baird Shearer 17:58, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Graeme Obree
Thanks for the note. I have noticed regular mentions of Graeme in Cycling Weekly over recent months. In the run-up to this month's 10-mile championship (held near my old home town of Nantwich), he was a non-starter, but only a week early won the Fullarton Wheelers 25-mile time trial. The Fullarton club seems to be based in Ayrshire (sample contacts have addresses in Kilwinning and Glengarnock). Paul W

Veganism Links
Hi Tony!

Although I appreciate that you've put a lot of effort into the "Veganism" entry, I politely suggest that you've been a bit heavy-handed on editing out so many Vegan-related links.

You recently edited out organizations, the most popular vegan lecturer on the circuit, some vegan blogs, and so forth.

I don't believe the credibility or accuracy of the entry was hampered by these links being included, and many of the ones you "cut" would have been useful to those exploring veganism.

I urge you to show a little more restraint in the future regarding links.... imho, they deserve a little more lattitude, and can help people if not edited so much.

However, I'd love to see them alphabetized and may take that on some time (at least they are more or less right now).

Best regards from a fellow vegan... Mark Sutton 11/02/05

Photo requested
You live in Glasgow, so could you take a pic of the Jordanhill railway station and upload it to Wikipedia? It's our 1 millionth English language article. -- user:zanimum

ABC and Simula
Long long time ago you added this sentence to the Guido van Rossum article: "He worked on the development of the ABC programming language, a descendant of the Simula language." Might you have a reference for this relationship between these two languages? I can't find any support for the claim and don't see much they have in common, other than both being imperative languages. Lambiam 04:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

I found this quote on the SETL page:
 * Python's predecessor, ABC, was inspired by SETL -- Lambert Meertens spent a year with the SETL group at NYU before coming up with the final ABC design!
 * --Guido van Rossum

I'll remove the Simula clause from the article. Lambiam 16:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The sentence in the talk announcement you found was clearly copied from the Wikipedia entry on GvR! By the way, you put your reply on my User page; I've moved it to my User talk page. Lambiam 13:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Trimhobies.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Trimhobies.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 15:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Care Commission
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the edits to Care Commission; it's great to see an article take of and develop. Cheers. --Brideshead 19:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hunza diet
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hunza diet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. OccamzRazor 22:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * That is too bad: I suspect it was a good one, though veganism/orthopathy/raw foodism are probably the most important.--Dchmelik (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Understand
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Understand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Understand. B. Wolterding 15:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Goodness (band)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Goodness (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Goodness (band). Gavin Collins (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Survey request
Hi, TonyClarke I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You, BCproject (talk) 08:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Shoes (GUI toolkit)
A tag has been placed on Shoes (GUI toolkit) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Merenta (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: raw foodism, veganism and another topic
Peace be with you,

You asked if I thought raw foodism should be called rawism. Actually I am in favour, and if it is done of course there should be a redirect.

I see you are interested in veganism and Dr. Fuhrman, who I think is either a Natural Hygiene (NH) doctor or recommends NH without saying. Would you be interested in discussing/editing the orthopathy article? (that alternate name is okay I guess since there is a newer scientific theory also named 'natural hygiene.') Verbal and I have been arguing over what is appropriate for the article. I had added several non-criticized and mainstream citations supporting NH, but some editors seem to want the page skewed to reactionary, uneducated critical viewpoints. Verbal did bring up good points about what would be better style and formatting. Others have tried to improve/expand the article and have added some good citations, but I am not sure the style is okay (there are many tags saying it is not, though some may just be reactionary.) I am not asking you to discuss/edit if you do not want to, and there are some NH aspects I am skeptical about such as whether vaccines prevented pandemics and whether 100% rawism is advisable, but it seems the diet part might be in your topics and the article has been deleted several times in the past. It seems worth keeping, since for example one could eat fries & salad and be vegan but not get enough of some nutrients, but unless one did get them one would not be NH, so it is about the only Western idea distinguished from veganism that way, but the critic cited in the article (Barrett) does not understand that and the American Dietetic Association (ADA) contradicts him on whether veganism is healthy. A friend who writes/lectures recommending veganism lately told me the ADA recommended vegetarianism. I do not know if they said anything more on veganism, but The China Study, which Fuhrman has referred to, also has a significantly contrary viewpoint to Barrett, as I had once explained in the article. I may not be editing it for a while because I am just tired of my non-criticized and mainstream citations being removed; I just thought you might be interested in this one.

I am quite interested in the raw foodism article and hope it stays reasonable, though I am not 100% rawist myself anymore. I could not get enough calories without having a pretty difficult/limited diet, and I have read some detailed refutations of whether various substances are present/better/relevant in raw food. I still try to do up to 90% but if I am doing athleticism or intense thinking (philosophy or math/computing, ...) it seems rawism does not work well. Of course if someone got sick and so then fasted it would potentially harm the digestive system to not eat raw afterwards, but it seems humans evolved by eating more calories from cooked food. One recent NPR interview says other apes prefer some cooked food, but I wonder what other animals do and if there still might be a way to go 100% raw. I have some ideas on improving raw food processes. Maybe I am wrong in not trying them immediately before other work and not doing 100% raw, but who knows: I still think 50% - 90% is fine. Another reason I do not go 100% is some doctors of NH or osteopathy (which seems to have adopted the fundamental NH idea but not applied it much) recommend not eating before solar noon if avoidable, so I do, so it is harder to get calories. Some historical spiritual groups do that (e.g. Essenes) or only eat before noon instead (e.g. Buddhist monks) and I wonder if they would be appropriate for the list of diets you have edited or the fasting article.

I see you edited Christian anarchism. To put it mildly I am a Christian (or Theosophist/Bahai) Platonist, but I think anarchism and Platonic Republic might end up the same way. Ethical anarchism and Classical Philosophy both hold the practice of virtue to be part of the highest ideal. I still think anarchy is an idea for youth--not me anymore. Activism in the context of famous quotes of Jefferson, Gandhi, MLK (and various conflicting thinkers I feel like avoiding mentioning) is good, but I also think it is okay to participate virtuously in governed society. It seems established anarchy still leads to what an anarchist friend of mine calls 'power relationships'--like in governed society. However as an ideal it is still best if everyone is virtuous enough to govern themselves, which you could call either anarchy or a Republic beyond its Classical model. I was wondering if Christian anarchism is your philosophy or if you are just interested, but you need not say. I am always interested in what someone into philosophy, veganism, and computing thinks of social topics or what articles one thinks could improve.--Dchmelik (talk) 04:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your thoughts
I hadn't looked at natural hygiene, I certainly agree with most of its principles. Medicine conventionally often reacts to symptoms rather than causes, and always runs the risk of making things worse. Also I have benefitted from fasting in the past. I will add to the article if I can think of relevant stuff.

Christian anarchism just appeals to me as a happy joining of ideas which I separately support. I suppose it doesn't have to be Christian: Bahai was (is?) seen as anarchist in its birthplace, and most religions have been persecuted as a threat to the established order, whether this was true or not. But look what happened to the Roman Empire! Anarchism I find a philosophically attractive idea, I think it is authority which is the non-natural idea, although apparently sometimes necessary.

'Rawist' I think is even less widely used, at least in my neck of the woods, than 'raw foodist'. Anyway, what's in a name, I think it's important the page is slimmed down and better organised in a NPOV way.

Good to talk with a fellow spirit!

Points of sail
Hi Tony,

See my comment about recovering from being in irons; I think there was a typo in your edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirclicksalot (talk • contribs) 11:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

References for Articles
Hi,

I noticed you were working on referencing the Dinghy sailing article and I wanted to give you some friendly pointers. I am assuming that you are going to eventually take this article back to GAN and to that end I would suggest putting you references into a template and not having links though out the page. I added the template and move some of your references into templates already. This should make it easier for you to continue a more standard type of referencing using copy past and changing the appropriate info. A couple of other things I would like to note
 * 1) I didn't look at it too closely but one of you links looks like it's to a collection of books for sale with a brief exert from the book. You would be better served to find the book through a Google search - or the like - and use a citation template and add all of the information.
 * 2) There is a book listed as a reference. I thought it might be beneficial to look at some other pages that extensively use books as references ways of adding inline citation. The Bobby Orr and Art Ross pages have a lot of inline citation from books and a extensive bibliography section, so if you are planning on use lots of references from books it might help to see how those pages handed it.

Hope this helps. Cheers --Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips
Hi Leech 44

Very helpful, will have to put aside some time and get this done. Appreciate your help!

TonyClarke (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Kantian veganism
Yep, fair enough ;-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Nagel
A most excellent rant. We need more like that one. SlimVirgin TALK |  CONTRIBS 17:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Power (philosophy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Contemporary ethics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hume and Quine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

What is your knowledge of ethics and philosophy?
Okay, you "edited" article on ethics on basis that "the anonymous poster needs to justify its inclusion from among hundreds of similar works". So tell me which classical works on ethics are not even mentioned in this article? And if you somehow figure out after googling, please add them to the list while removing the truly unnecessary content. Tony, it is very easy to play "editor" deleting content (bandwagoning with another "editor" with blatant illiteracy), but yes, it is difficult to add content... And read this http://chronicle.com/article/The-Undue-Weight-of-Truth-on/130704/ it will help you in your Wiki endeavours... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.198.186 (talk) 02:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

My knowledge
It depends on what you mean by knowledge : ) I have a Master's degree in moral philosophy from the University of Glasgow here in Scotland, since you ask. But I hope my views stand up on their own. TonyClarke (talk) 16:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I was thinking last night: you're right that the work I suggested is one among many and actually I accept your point. I appreciate also the fact that you answered my question. Good example... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.198.186 (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but you said that you do teachings about god but in each and everyone of your so called educational articles and chats you haven't mentioned god so all I am asking is that you can make a chat where you just talk about father God for once pls Jokerkick (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry just read your bio now so pls don't reply to that Jokerkick (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks
I appreciate your asking, and thanks for the open way you have dealt with this. I wish you well in your work here, you are right to question edits, there are some editors who can appear to be overly negative. Tony TonyClarke (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Thought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piaget (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Individualism
Hi Tony,

it appears to me that individualism is written in American English. Of course it's hard to find an absolute result on such a thing in such a long article, but there is only one Commonwealth -our ending in the whole piece, prior to Hendrick 99's edit. Looking at his pattern of recent edits, it appears that he is on a mission to remove American English, directly against WP:ENGVAR. If he made good edits too, OK, go ahead and re-add them &mdash; in American English. --Trovatore (talk) 07:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I see you've left a message on my talk. I'll respond there. --Trovatore (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=567716342 your edit] to Douglas C-47 Skytrain may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571209432 your edit] to Hermann Lotze may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Schiller and Herder. All of these expressed in some degree their indebtedness to [Leibniz] . Lotze can be said to have brought philosophy out of the lecture-room into the market-place of

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571619619 your edit] to Reason may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * colloquially as the dilemma between following "the head" (reason) "or the heart" (emotions).

Nomination of Understand (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Understand (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Understand (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 12:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Article on enaction
Tony: I hope you might take an interest in a new stub Enaction (philosophy) in view of your subsection on this topic in Enaction, which article is not directly concerned with the philosophical aspects. Brews ohare (talk) 16:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Tony: There have been some radical changes in Enaction (philosophy). Your own efforts are appreciated. I hope you'll continue to add to this article and participate in its evolution. Brews ohare (talk) 20:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=603292907 your edit] to Enaction (philosophy) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * affordances Gibson, sensorimotor expectations Alva Noë and mutual enactive structuring Varela, Thompson and Rosch (1992) . This enactivism avoids dualism, or what they

Veganism
Re this edit: Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 22:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linguistic modality, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irrealism and Realism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Question about an edit of yours
Hi Tony, I just posted a question at Talk:Contemporary_philosophy which is about an edit of yours there. I'd appreciate if you could swing by and clarify. Thanks! --Pfhorrest (talk) 03:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Look, if you encourage a new editor to indulge in personal attacks all that is going to result is that they will end up being blocked.  I could have reported that edit (along with an earlier post making a Nazi reference) and coupled with the fact that ALL their other edits have been to promote their web site (that now includes one article deleted, and another shortly to be deleted), I am pretty sure they would have received a block or warning.   As it is I have tried on their talk page to refer them to policy in the hope they can turn things round. You could help out there if you really want to make a difference.  If, as you just have, you make it clear they can get away with it then they will just get worse.   If you check their history multiple attempts to get them to read or abide by policy have just been ignored.  The relevant policy which they clearly broke with that comment can be found here.  If I remember aright you tried to be nice to Brews as well and he just got worse to the point where he was permanently banned from Wikipedia (if my memory is wrong apologies)   Snowded  TALK 12:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * OK you've chosen to reinstate it. I'm not edit warring with you as the personal attack is clear to any experienced editor.   To be honest I'm amazed that an editor with your experience would encourage that type of comment, or for that matter the self-promotional edits and article creation by an editor who has chosen to ignore all offers of help and all references to policy.  Foolish at best  Snowded  TALK 13:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Good and evil
Why you reverted my edit? What sourced content has been erased? Lbertolotti (talk) 01:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Veganism. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 06:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

A comment about your user page
I suspect that it is not good Wikipedia behaviour to comment on something that an editor puts on their user page - this is, after all, where we are allowed to put opinions and other stuff that are not OK anywhere else. However, I noticed that you have Highland Clearances listed under Genocide. The generally accepted view by post-Prebble historians is that no-one was deliberately killed as a result of the Clearances and that any deaths that did occur were of very elderly or sick people who would have died anyway, but might have had the event accelerated by eviction. Hence, to suggest that the Clearances fits the normal understanding of genocide is bizarre. The "man in the street" view of genocide involves deliberately murdering a number of people of one ethnic or religious group. (And I don't think many experts would argue with that.) I appreciate that the original definition of the term also included preventing such a population from breeding, but I don't think that there was any compulsory segregation of men and women, nor were there any mass sterilisations at the time of the Clearances. Listing the Clearances as a genocide really does a serious disservice to those who are the victims of genuine genocide events -if I were a survivor of, say, Bosnian Genocide I would be very upset to find that what happened to my friends and relatives was equated with someone being evicted as part of the reorganisation of a Highland estate - especially when, in the first phase of the Clearances, alternative accommodation was often made available and, in the second phase, assisted passages were provided for many who emigrated.

I note, also, that you wrote much of the very earliest part of the text of Highland Clearances. The later studies of this subject move the subject on a lot from Prebble et al. It might be helpful for me to include an extract from the talk page archive for this article: ''However, I think that we need to be very careful that whatever goes into the article has some significant measure of academic support. This is why I try and limit the majority of sources to Richards (who is probably the most prolific writer on the subject and is now an emeritus professor of history at a major Australian university http://www.flinders.edu.au/people/eric.richards), Devine (perhaps the most technically correct historian on the subject, a professor at Edinburgh University http://www.ed.ac.uk/history-classics-archaeology/about-us/staff-profiles/profile_tab1_academic.php?uun=tdevine), Jim Hunter (whose personal views very much tend towards great sadness at the empty highland landscapes - read his twitter page for more, amidst the modern Scottish politics - but even he shows a firm academic rigour, as in his treatment of, for example, the burning of Badinloskin in his book on the Sutherland Clearances, debunking some of the more hysterical elements of mythology of this event - his academic post is https://www.uhi.ac.uk/en/research-enterprise/cultural/centre-for-history/staff/professor-james-hunter/ ). As a second level of choice, I would include Michael Lynch (https://www.penguin.co.uk/authors/michael-lynch/1005855/), Michael Fry (who has the downside of also dabbling in journalism, but is also a widely published historian).'' The bulk of the relevant works by these authors were published prior to the 2003 edits that got Highland Clearances off the ground. I don't know if you are aware of any of these experts in the field or have read any of their work.

Sorry to take you to task on all this - but at the end of the day, the objective is to get it right! ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Plant communication
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Plant communication &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Edaham (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

You have received this message as you are one of the most recent names in either the source or destination article's history page. This proposal serves two purposes, namely Many thanks for your time! Edaham (talk) 01:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) To suggest a merge (obviously) of the overlapping material
 * 2) To draw attention to the source article (the info to be merged into the destination article, which requires expansion)

If you have the energy ...
DRP discussion on the Heidegger article here. I think it is worth one last attempt to get a mediated process on this and this could be it -Snowded TALK 07:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Also, problems in philosophy would be found, only, in the 'subjects' philosophy pursues...Consciousness is a subject in many fields of study...Subjects are where problems are studied and should not be part of the lead paragraph for understanding the Philosophy article...I mean no harm, please, both of you read more about Contemporary philosophy. thanks, Arnlodg (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your deletion of my entry to HARD PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNES
Hello TonyClarke and WikiPedant, I’m surprised of the way you worked without let me know why. The below answer to DVdm to your attention: Hello DVdm, what you are saying is not how it is. I did not even know who deleted my entry, I also did not get any critique at any time, and I never changed or deleted the entry of other contributers. So I did NOT start an „edit-war“ as you obviously think. How could I discuss and seek consensus if I even don’t know who the competitor is? THAT‘S UNSCIENTIFIC BEHAVIOUR. I did not receive any arguments. It’s also not correct that the two users Tony Clarke and Wiki Pedant provided sound reasons in their edit summaries why my contributuion was „inappropriate“. It is appropriate and it directly addresses the term „integrated information“ by modifying what the term should cover. It’s an „edit-war“ initiated by competitors in an unfair way. What is correct is that I added my own (preprint-published) view on „integrated information“ but that’s a legitimate and, in my opinion, scientifically important contribution. How then can we solve that problem? Wolfgang Kromer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kromer (talk • contribs) 10:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

To your attention: Hello DVdm, I wonder what the scientific basis of Tony Clarke is to decide my contribution was „inappropriate“. All what I could find on his user page is TonyClarke’s statement: „My interests include sailing, cycling, philosophy,photography,healthy eating (vegan) and general messing about with computers, eg wikis, Python programming, etc.. [...] I try to follow the teachings of Jesus.“ No one single scientific entry that I could find. It’s different with User:WikiPedant. From a retired university professor, I had expected sound arguments, not just a „NO“. That’s poor! Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Kromer

deletion of your entry to HARD PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Professor Kromer: The deletion was not made on the basis of people's status, nor the validity of the argument in your edit. It simply was against the rues of Wikipedia, which states that people's opinion without published support for what is written should not be allowed. That is called 'original research', and while that is valued on other contexts, on Wikipedia we are not permitted to discuss or put forward our personal opinions when we are adding to a page. Please do not let this discourage you from adding to Wikipedia, there is ample guidance on how to do this on the Wikipedia home page. TonyClarke (talk) 23:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Total Immersion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Total Immersion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Total Immersion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wolfch (talk) 01:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Consciousness in Action moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Consciousness in Action, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
 * Kindly do the needful and
 * Put an introduction or overview
 * Cite your sources
 * Add some references
 * Add some categories.
 * Thank you.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:53, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Whiteguru

TonyClarke (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Consciousness in Action
Hello, TonyClarke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Consciousness in Action, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Consciousness in Action


Hello, TonyClarke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Consciousness in Action".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Living foods diet" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Living_foods_diet&redirect=no Living foods diet] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)