User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 91

Better source request for File:EMK eulogy of RFK.ogg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:EMK eulogy of RFK.ogg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:ActionDay1 lg.jpg
 * File:Israel hadari 2955 lg.jpg
 * File:Preval-2.jpg
 * File:Preval-1.jpg
 * File:Composition in Black and White, 1917.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:53, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Hershiser Review
Hey,

So sorry to take so long to get back to you; my wikipedia time over the last couple days has been filled dealing with a really disruptive editor (going to be preparing an RFC/U it looks like). Anyway, if you still need a peer reviewer, I would be happy to take it on. Indrian (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter
The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer, whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * and were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
 * scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
 * scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Featured topics/She Wolf.
 * scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
 * has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Updated Feature Picture Nomination
Hello, changes has been made at Featured picture candidates/Bixby Creek Bridge, an edited image has been added. Feel free to change your vote. Thank you. Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of ///Euro Car  GT  04:29, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!
Allow me to add my heartfelt thanks - actually you deserve a good glass of Żubrówka!!--Smerus (talk) 14:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Spike Albrecht
Allen3 talk 09:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Wiki ViewStats
Hi TonyTheTiger! Sorry for the long time I didn't answer your question, you've my apologies. But finally, it was done ;) de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Wiki_ViewStats together with the new version 5 of Wiki ViewStats. And thanks for your comments. Kind regards --Hedonil (talk) 02:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics
I am trying to get some reviewers for Featured article candidates/Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics/archive2. It had an earlier nomination but failed for lack of reviewers. If you could take a few minutes to post even a short review, it would be much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=594141894 your edit] to Venric Mark may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Wildcats football|Northwestern Wildcats]]. He has completed his redshirt (college sports) redshirt junior season for the 2013 team. He was a [[

FYI
Hi Tony. FYI:. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  04:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the reversion. Slip of the finger on mobile. Green Giant (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi again Tony. Sorry for the disturbance, but I think I was able to finally reconstruct the DYK's views:. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  22:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * , in theory your calculation would be correct if your toolserver and stats.grok.se were calculating the exact same thing. I have reason to believe that your toolserver is underestimating its totals by some minor variants. Variants are different than redirects. They are alternate code spellings of the same page that dont redirect. E.g., Wilhelm_Zahn, Wilhelm Zahn, wilhelm Zahn and Wilhelm%20Zahn are all considered variants. I don't think your toolserver calculation is including the same variants as stats.grok.se.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you Tony, I see. I guess we can use this as a first approximation. Hopefully the exact figure can be reconstructed at some point. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  01:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

re GAR possibly of interest
, the page at GAR is interesting and I've been trying to follow the discussion of and on but unfortunately it's getting a little bit on the TL;DR side. Perhaps you could summarize the main disagreements for me at this point in time? Or not just for me, but put a new comment unindented on the GAR review page with a basic summary of the disagreements up til now?

Otherwise, and/or in addition to that, I may just swing by and comment with first an Image/Stability Review, followed by an assessment of the page in relation to the criteria of WP:WIAGA, if I get a chance in the next couple days.

Cheers,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅,, point-by-point WP:WIAGA assessment added. Hopefully this is helpful, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Bikini
I believe the GA nomination was quite premature. It was proposed by an editor who didn't really want to do the hard work, and made very little contribution in terms of information, writing or fixing the article. Sorry about that, though I believe it could still be worked to the level of a GA.

I have addressed some of your concerns. I have left the lead section for the last. And, I have very serious issues with the "issues" section. It was made mostly by an editor who has very little care for encyclopedic standards. I think I am going to make some radical changes there.

But, I seriously need a guiding/reviewing eye. Can you lend a hand there? Aditya (talk • contribs) 13:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Barack Obama with artistic gymnastic McKayla Maroney
hi it's Manray2Manray2 (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC) and I have been wondering if you are a fan of Duke basketball, I saw you edited Jabari Parker and was just wondering

Annie Hall GA Review
Thanks for reviewing the article! Unfortunately, I won't have enough time to work on it until Thursday. Just thought I should in form you. Thanks again though! -- NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 02:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts

New Category
Added Category:Wikipedians who edit Wikipedia to your User Page, for your approval. A little humor! If you don't like, you can of course remove.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tyler Ulis
Hello! Your submission of Tyler Ulis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Tipitina
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Cards (season 2), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AMC and The Walking Dead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Annie Hall
Do you mind checking the article now and the revisions I've made? I think I've done everything you've asked. -- NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 03:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom of Speech.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Freedom of Speech.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom of Worship.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Freedom of Worship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom From Fear painting.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Freedom From Fear painting.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

More Demi Moore
You have removed a photo reference that illustrated a predecessor both in terms of topic and reception: The subject of the photos (pregnant woman) and her posture (in profile) display obvious parallels, as does the public reaction to the respective publications. Excluding such a relevant predecessor, the article in its current form wrongly suggests that Leibovitz's portrait of Moore was the first photo of a pregnant woman, and the first to receive criticism. Pointing back to McBride's example from the 1960's provides important context, both in terms of art history and sociology.

And I would argue that the photo archive of the Deutsches Historisches Museum qualifies as a "reliable source."

--Webmgr (talk) 21:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited House of Cards (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benito Martinez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive
It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:


 * This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
 * Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
 * The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
 * An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:20060819 Moose (W-02-03) (1).JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:20060819 Moose (W-02-03) (1).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Magazine polls
That sounds a bit WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; some of the sources on Gomes do actually write about other women and how it's remarkable or significant that they featured on a magazine's list, which sounds like a useful yardstick for which polls are worth mentioning in an encyclopedia biography. We risk cherry-picking if we're presenting poll results which never got any press attention - does Gomes rising to 8th position and dropping to 94th imply that she was most famous in 2013 and is now in decline, or just that AskMen ran a feature on her in the same month that they asked readers to think of some women for a poll? --McGeddon (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Having said that, I see the article apparently passed a GA review in December, so I'll raise this on the talk page. --McGeddon (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Annie Hall
Could you check now, please? -- NoD&#39;ohnuts (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)NoD'ohnuts

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokerstove example equity calculation.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pokerstove example equity calculation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokerstove Sample range of top 13 percent of hands.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pokerstove Sample range of top 13 percent of hands.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Malapropism
Hello, TonyTheTiger. You recently added the template Much Ado About Nothing to the article Malapropism. Although the article does talk a bit about Dogberry, I wouldn't say that the article is really related to the play. How widely do you think that template should be used? (By the way, you also added a link to Malapropism in the template. Since Mrs. Malaprop comes from Sheridan, not Shakespeare, a link via the redirect Dogberryism would make more sense.) Cnilep (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Shakespeare Templates
Hi Tony, seeing as how you're posting on the Project talk page, we may as well keep the conversation centralized there, so any outstanding issues you raised on my talk page, I'll address there. Cheers. Bertaut (talk) 16:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

The Quality of Mercy (Shakespeare quote)
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on The Quality of Mercy (Shakespeare quote), appears to be directly copied from http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/297200.html. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on The Quality of Mercy (Shakespeare quote) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 28 February 2014 (UTC)