User talk:Tony Floyd Parker

July 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Brandon Nuw Crawford, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Brandon Nuw Crawford. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

It is obvious that you are the same editor as. Therefore, I have blocked both of your accounts. Repeated removal of the AfD notice on the Brandon Nuw Crawford article nor blanking of the discussion will stop the deletion discussion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Inclusion in Wikipedia
Hello. In response to the comment you had left at, and then removed from, the Crawford talk page the inclusion of article topics on Wikipedia is based on notability. Articles can be speedily deleted if they given no sense why the topic is significant (basically, why one would even think it would be an encyclopedia article). Notability is measured largely, though not entirely, according to signs that a topic has been the subject of significant discussion in reliable sources.
 * Having been on a movie screen is not automatically considered a sign of significance or notability. Being listed in IMDb, for movie actors, is like being listed in the phone directory: it's routine.
 * Wikipedia isn't measuring people's own sense of accomplishment. The websites may have been an amazing undertaking, but we aren't judging that. For the websites themselves to have articles, reliable sources would have to have found them significant enough to have reported on them. Even then, notability isn't inherited. For the Crawford article to survive, there would have to be appropriate coverage of him. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
—Largo Plazo (talk) 15:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)