User talk:Tony Lombard

I was blocked after my first editing. The editing followed all Wikipedia guides and rules. I followed a previous editing from a previous user. All cited sources are correct and some are based on Court evidence or on other Wikipedia info. All edited information is correct and accurate. I do not understand why other Wikipedia users are insisting on maintaining Joao Vale e Azevedo page inaccurate, incomplete and offensive, Why? it looks like they are not interested on given accurate information on Joao Vale e Azevedo but only a small and false part of his history. Also their quoted sources are only from tabloids not even credible sources or media. All this is very odd. Why a inaccurate, incomplete and offensive version on Joao Vale e Azevedo is the one that always stands in the end and looks protected? Why is not possible to edit an accurate, complete and honest version of that man? Please unblock me and allow me to edit the true and do things right. Best regards, Tony Lombard (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)