User talk:Tony Mobily

Your question
I answered to your question on my talkpage (to keep the discussion in one place). Hope to see you around, have a nice day! --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Concerning your messages on talk pages
Please sign your messages using four tildes ( ~ ). Thank you. Nat Tang talk to me! 15:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Homeopathy
Hi Tony. I'm going to write a longer reply to your post on Talk:Homeopathy, but I wanted to drop you a short note. I am willing to compromise on the lead criticism (and the other editors probably are too), but you should discuss on the talk page rather than reverting. Please read WP:3RR, if you haven't already. Thanks! Skinwalker 18:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have read WP:3RR. However, with this article I have seen numerous reverts with no explanation, and endless discussion with no resolution. I felt that in this case editing the page AND explaining why would be the only way to get anything to actually happen... which is sad.
 * May be you should try a new venue? (for inspiration) Not sure if it is any better, how does it look? David D. (Talk) 07:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the link David. I ding the article in Citizendium still a little biased, but it IS 100 better than Wikipedia's...

Science
Hey Tony,

Science has definitely been proven wrong many times but that's what's so great about it! I found this article (Scientific Method) really interesting and I think it'll help to explain how it's impossible for science to be biased against anything. I've often heard that science is just another religion. It's a view that's often pushed by people who believe in creationism or homeopathy and it shows a true lack of understanding of the scientific method. I really recommend reading it, its really neat stuff.Pdelongchamp 18:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk
Hey Tony,

I'm not too sure what you meant when you said you'd write about the value of wikipedia or reproducing the discussion but I wanted to let you know that it came off as a threat and I would advise against writing something like that in the future. The comments your were replying to were seriously laking in faith and I can understand why you were upset but it's always best to walk away or respond in good faith when replying to messages like that. Otherwise, things just go downhill. Let's ignore the last few comments and keep up the discussion. Other than this weekend, I think it's moving along well. Cheers. Pdelongchamp 17:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Apollo (software)


A tag has been placed on Apollo (software) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Apollo_overview.png
Thank you for uploading File:Apollo_overview.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Melesse (talk) 06:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Apollo logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Apollo logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Apollo (software)


A tag has been placed on Apollo (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Light2021 (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Apollo overview.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Apollo overview.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Apollo (software) logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Apollo (software) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)