User talk:Tonyprescott

Hello, and welcome to wikipedia. Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Revert
I have red some of your publications on verbal fluency since I am in the way of publishing something similar to your works. Your knowledge is most welcomed to this article or any others you may edit. However I have just reverted one of your additions to the verbal fluency article: The reason is that the list of verbal fluency examples you inserted is unreferenced and will constitute original research (See WP:NOR). As I am a neuropsychologist I know it is true, however, unless you provide a reference for the specific example it does not belong to wikipedia. A possibility could be to add instead the mean number of words said by children at different ages or clinical populations (and a reference). If you have any questions feel free to ask at my talk page. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Continue working on it because you have done a great job. Do not doubt to contact me if you want anything. You might also find interesting to join a wikiproject (See WikiProject Medicine and WikiProject Psychology), since there you can find people interested in collaborating in similar topics. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 16:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Rereading your contributions I think we will have to be careful to explictily say that all what you have written only applies for semantic fluency tests, but not phonetic fluency.Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The image is perfect. The article has been greatly improved. Additionally NOR policity is usually not so tight regarding images compared to text.--Garrondo (talk) 06:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)