User talk:Tonywalton/Archive-Aug-2013

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

blocking user
I am bringing this to your talk page because you suggest that it might be a content dispute here.

It is not a content dispute. His or her edits only caught my attention because it is clear that 1) the edits are written in very bad English, and some of the edits are incomprehensible (e.g. I have no idea what "Important People with Founder of Li" means here, 2) some of the edits are clearly wrong and completely garbled (e.g here, I don't know what "at the early Han Dynasty, Xiang Chan (項羽) had surname Liu (劉) with catch a family name of Liu Bang" could mean. I spend some time trying to fix some of the problems created by this editor by checking some Chinese websites, but a lot of it is hard to check because I can't find any source for those in other Chinese websites. It is also not clear if the editor actually understands what is being edited, and I don't think the editor understands Chinese well enough for him or her to make the edits, for example the editor wrote Xiang Chan (項羽) when 項羽 is a completely different person from Xiang Chan. The editor actually just repeated the same mistake here, and some wrong Chinese words were also used in other edits, suggesting that the editor don't actually understand Chinese well. It calls into question whether the editor is competent to edit per WP:COMPETENCE, and since there is no source to check, it is not certain what's written is nonsense or not. It's the reason why his or her edits were removed, and I would be happy to put them back if I can find a source for those information.

I also find it puzzling that the someone who was apparently blocked for block evasion here (I assume it has been checked that the user is User talk:Bmotbmot who is indefinitely blocked) can still edit when he or she is still doing exactly the same thing for which the block was put in place. 01:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)