User talk:Toonarmy7724

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Howard.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Staff201999567809876543234567890.JPG. The copy called Image:Staff201999567809876543234567890.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Mike borat.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Mike borat.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 17:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

File:Mike Howard.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mike Howard.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)