User talk:Toothplow

Nomination of Flower Co for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flower Co is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flower Co until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ninjaediator (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Toothplow, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Praxidicae (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * And for the last time, you are not permitted to remove or close a nomination on your own work. An administrator specifically left it open because it had merit. Praxidicae (talk) 22:26, 4 May 2020 (UTC)