User talk:Tophermith

Week 3
Well, I found your article linked from your user page, you left a review, and you even signed your comments.Your review was not particularly helpful though since it stated problems already identified, or that are true of all stub-class articles. Scores will be posted on Moodle. --MTHarden (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deaf hearing


The article Deaf hearing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sources found beyond the single ones here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Deaf hearing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deaf hearing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deaf hearing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)