User talk:Topology Expert

Retirement
I have decided to retire from Wikipedia. Whether I am able to go without editing Wikipedia (or not) is a different question altogether but I think it is best for everyone if I retire. Mainly, the past 2-3 months of Wikipedia has been a complete waste of time for everyone. People have forgotten the main reason for editing Wikipedia; instead 'discussions' are taking a large chunk of user contributions. Edit, then discuss is far better than discuss, then edit when by the time the discussion is over, people would have forgotten what they wanted to edit. So to stop wasting valuable time (for everyone including me), I have decided to (permanently) retire from Wikipedia. I will however, read any messages regarding current discussions in Wikipedia for the next week but I am unlikely to respond or edit any longer.

Topology Expert (talk) 11:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I do find these discussions somewhat superfluous, particularly the current AfD which has little merit in my opinion, but you could consider retiring for a week, for instance. Best of luck, Katzmik (talk) 12:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

un-archiving
Why did you "add back" the mathematics reference desk entries for December 11 with this edit? Any changes made to the section after you did that were just lost when the archiving bot was unable to properly archive the page a second time. —Steve Summit (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Per Steve, please don't do this. Any changes you make to a transcluded archive page should show up on the main page. If you are having caching problems take a look at Purge. Basically all you should need to do is add ?action=purge to the end of the page URL and then hit enter or the icon on your browser to access the URL. You may need to do this to both the archived page and the main page, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Mathematics/2008_December_11?action=purge and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Mathematics?action=purge (in this order). If you continue to have problems, that likely it's a browser problem on your side and everyone else should be seeing the correct page. To resolve a caching issue take a look at Bypass your cache (generally holding shift or ctrl and then hitting the refresh icon on your browser should work although it depends on your browser). P.S. While not the issue here, if you want to add an older date back after it has disappeared completely off the main reference desk page then please just transclude the archive again using something like this . You should generally find some transcluded pages on each reference desk main page so just copy that example.Nil Einne (talk) 12:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Another way of doing purge is editing your monobook.js to include a small script which puts a "purge" button at the top, alongside edit/history/etc. Feel free to pinch the one on mine (I forget who I pinched it off). Orderinchaos 23:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Reference Desk Regulars
Thank you for all your contributions to the Wikipedia Reference Desk! In recognition of your work I have added your name to the list of Reference Desk Regulars. If you would prefer not to be listed, please let me know or simply remove your signature. Thanks again, and happy editing! –  7 4   09:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cosmic space


The article Cosmic space has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Hi. The one citation here is broken and I'm having a hard time finding reliable secondary sources for "cosmic space," please add citations. Thanks!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SarahStierch (talk) 18:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Locally regular space


The article Locally regular space has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "By the page creator's own admission (see Talk:Locally regular space) and my brief research efforts, the concept of a locally regular space seems to have been devised here for this article. This clearly goes against WP:GNG and WP:OR."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Locally regular space for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Locally regular space is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Locally regular space until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Felix QW (talk) 08:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 00:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)