User talk:Torchiest/Archive 15

Talkback
— ΛΧΣ  21  04:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Discount-licensing.com
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Discount-licensing.com. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Dwarf (Dungeons & Dragons)/GA1
I've almost completed the review at Talk:Dwarf (Dungeons & Dragons)/GA1; since this article appears short but solid, in keeping with its subject, only a few dwarf-sized fixes need to be made. Take a look, and thanks for your work. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

A dwarven ale for you!

 * By the way, Sports and Recreation didn't seem to have a logical spot for this, so I stuck it under "Toys" for now. You may want to move it if you have a better idea. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I wasn't sure on that. There is a discussion here about splitting sports and recreation, which I thought would make RPG articles a better fit in just recreation.  Or maybe toys should be expanded to toys and games? Thanks for the ale though; I shall quaff it with gusto. —Torchiest talkedits 15:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

HighBeam for D&D articles (part 6c)
Are you ready for it? After all this time and work, we are almost done with the WP:DND VG articles. It's a big one, but all that remains is the Neverwinter Nights series. Here is the original NWN and its expansions, and I'll get to NWN2 afterwards.

– covers the whole series?

Neverwinter Nights

Neverwinter Nights: Shadows of Undrentide

Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark BOZ (talk) 18:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hahaha oh my god. Still, NWN is one of my favorite RPGs ever, and I'd like to get it to FA eventually, so this could be a gold mine. —Torchiest talkedits 19:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * How are they looking so far? BOZ (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just an FYI, in case you've noticed I haven't been using every article I've cross out. There have been a few duplicate articles printed in different newspapers, a few trivial mentions, and some that don't have anything new and/or useful.  But it's coming along! :) —Torchiest talkedits 23:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I see! Sorry to dump so many hits on you at once... I promise that was the article with the most, and probably by far.  ;) BOZ (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the long delay. I added a nice bit about the educational use, but all the rest I just checked were trivial or duplicates again.  #28 is a trivial mention, but what it is talking about is a book that includes what could be a very nice bit of analysis for NWN.  Here is the book info:  Medievalism in Technology Old and New Cambridge: Brewer. 2008. ISBN 978-1-84384-156-2.  The last paragraph from the HighBeam article: "The latter part of Fugelso's collection has contributions by Carol L. Robinson, Oliver M. Traxel, Amy S. Kaufman, Brent Moberly and Kevin Moberly, and Lauryn S. Mayer. They all discuss medievalism in video games. They deal with pseudomedieval elements in computer role-playing, the feminine in Neverwinter Nights, ethics of empire in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, 'Rethinking of Gender in MMORPGs', and the like. Their expert discussion does not materially advance our knowledge of the Middle Ages. It might imply that video games are (as snooker once was) a way to misspend one's youth. But they potently suggest the allure of the medieval. Like every contribution in this book, they show that its appeal to the imagination or intellect cannot be stifled: a point worth remembering, when so many turn resolutely deaf ears to it."
 * I'll try to knock out the rest of these very soon! —Torchiest talkedits 04:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Excellent work! Might be nice to get our hands on that book - I wonder if it's at the local library? Just those two expansion sets to go, then NWN2, then the video games are finito. BOZ (talk) 02:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I couldn't find it in the county-wide library system in my area, but the article in question is about fifteen pages in that book, and about 80% of it is visible in Google books. —Torchiest talkedits 02:50, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Shadows is finished. The third source was just trivial. —Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 17:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * One more to go for the first set of NWN! ;) BOZ (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Warning
This is just to warn you not to stop making helpful, clearheaded file moves where needed, such as File:Daniel Stern ->File:Daniel Stern (writer). --Lexein (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Geez, that scared me for a second when I saw it on my watchlist. Thanks though. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 23:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm such a stinker. ;) --Lexein (talk) 12:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

RE:Ed, Edd n Eddy (season 2) good article
Hey, thanks for notifying me of the affair. Best, --Khanassassin ☪ 08:46, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Of course. Glad to see that it's working out. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 00:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Sorry for delay to respond. Thx for the friendly New Yr.'s greet at my Talk, and for your efforts at Xiangqi. (Thing is, it isn't really "my game", and I have only a couple of books. It perplexes me sometimes why there aren't more player-editors to tend the article, who specialize in the game?! As there certainly must be many.) Cheers, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, and no problem. Like I said, it's way down on the list right now, but someday... —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 00:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Daniel Stern (writer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to High School of Music and Art


 * Kiichi Matsuda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Experimental Station

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Organic milk
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Organic milk. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Abarangers
This is just a kind notice that I've reverted your bold edit to Abarangers in which you removed all information concerning the characters' allies, the characters' arsenal, and the characters' giant robot partners. These are all relevant to the discussion of the characters, if not the program they come from, and there's simply no where else to put the information.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 05:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand. I thought I'd go for a big cut first.  Still, the article could stand a little trimming. I may attempt some more delicate edits in the future.  Cheers. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 05:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Your work was nice, but you simply just nuked way too much that first time around. We've been working on the pages that come out more recently to have them more in line with the general standards of other pages (including references whenever we can find them), but these older shows are much more difficult to clean up. Right now there are only people yelling at us for translating a term that no one else bothered to do before us.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 06:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you considered renaming the article List of characters from Bakuryū Sentai Abaranger? —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 13:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Article history
You asked a question at the move discussion. Please see first if the former one on the same page helps. Or this, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yes, I'd read those, but the original move discussion said CamelCase "went out of fashion".  I was just wondering if there was a more technical reason for the change. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 18:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't even like it when it was in fashion, so welcomed the change - and did not like to be reverted when I used it that way, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Journey
Thanks! No, I worked on it to get it ready for FAC in December, so it's not eligible. -- Pres N  16:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Rule 34
I appreciate your attention to the accuracy of the entry for elementary cellular automaton on the dab page Rule 34. I wanted to note the dab page priorities of identifying and distinguishing in a minimal entry description. I think that, re the entry for elementary cellular automaton, using a form of the term "mathematical" (or something similar?) is probably the best way for the average reader (who may have a hazy concept of their desired article, particularly in the case of a fairly abstract topic) to quickly distinguish one entry from the next. "Elementary cellular automata" could, to the uninitiated easily appear to be a biological topic, for example. Is there some other copy we could use for the entry description that would be both accurate and accessible to the lay reader? ENeville (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * See what you think of the change I made. Cheers. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 17:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Tweaked that a bit. ENeville (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Notifying you that Batman Arkham City is up for FAC
I've nominated this article again, it failed last time not through opposition but lack of interest. It's a quality article encompassing all the available information in a neat, presentable and interesting way, so I hope you can lend your voice to the discussion if you have the time. Thanks for reading. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple days or this weekend at the latest. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 14:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Queen's Harvest
Do you have time for a last minute copyedit? This one has had probably the most vandalism in the last few weeks, so I bet if the tag goes away, so will the new vandal accounts. ;) BOZ (talk) 23:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. :) —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 23:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool - don't forget to add that one to your copyedit drive totals. :) BOZ (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Heh, thanks, I almost forgot that part. This is the busiest part of the month for coordinating lol. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 23:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Pruning drive page
Hi boss, just wanted to let you know that I'm starting to prune extra text from the drive page now. Just let me know if I'm in the way. --BDD (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Should I also verify and update the leaderboard? --BDD (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You can hold off on that for now. My script should be able to add up the totals, which will be easier than trying to do it by hand. If it's not working out, we might have to do it ourselves, but hopefully this will be a wonder of technological convenience. :) —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 00:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, just to clarify, I can hold off on the leaderboard, not the whole thing, right? Also, how should I treat articles still marked as working? --BDD (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, you can do everything except the leaderboard. As for the working tags, if you can check to see if the editor just forgot to mark them complete, and update them, that would be great.  If nothing has been done, just remove them.  Basically, there shouldn't be any working tags left on the page when we're finished with it. Thanks again. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 00:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter
Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:
 * was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
 * was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
 * was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
 * was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
 * was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:


 * was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
 * has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
 * claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of, who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Reporting for duty
I'm available for barnstars or whatever; please let me know how I can help. All the best,  Mini  apolis  15:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've almost got my script working.  Once I compile the final results, I will post them and divide up the barnstars.  With four of us splitting the work, it shouldn't be too difficult.  I'll put details of how to do it on the results page. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 15:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

D&D module copyedits
Thank you for your copyedits on D&D module articles, they are greatly appreciated. I did my best to try to clear up the items that needed clarifying on Queen's Harvest and Puppets (module). 24.12.74.21 (talk) 04:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. I enjoy reading about all these different adventures.  Some of them end up on my Amazon wish list. :) I will keep hacking away at them. Cheers. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 04:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I replied to your comment on the article talk page. 24.12.74.21 (talk) 01:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your thoughtful reply. :) 24.12.74.21 (talk) 05:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:VergeGameStudio
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:VergeGameStudio. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sexplosion!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thunderball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Gravity Bone FAC
Hey! I have nominated Gravity Bone for FA and I'd like to know if you would be able to review it. Thanks! — ΛΧΣ  21  18:35, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Just in case you missed this..... :) — ΛΧΣ  21  02:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll try to take a look at this in the next couple days or this weekend at the latest. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 14:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

RfC input needed
Hi. Input is needed on a an RfC. You were randomly selected from the WP:FRS list of editors willing to help with RfCs. If you have a moment, your help would be appreciated at the RfC about the Nobel Prize. Cheers. --Noleander (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Genesis P-Orridge
Hello there Torchiest. Just wanted to apologise for stubbing out your GA review nomination over at Genesis P-Orridge; the work that you have been doing over there recently is appreciated, but I want to clarify that I think there is a lot more that needs to be added to make it comprehensive; I shall use books by Ford and such to do so, if you will bear with me, because it may take some time. Problematically, I don't think there are many good sources dealing with his/her post-TG days;are you aware of any ? Furthermore, I feel that we might have better luck getting a related page, like that at COUM Transmissions, to GA status first. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Painful but Fabulous (ISBN 978-1887128889), which is a sort of semi-autobiography, should have a lot, although it came out a decade ago. —<B>Torchiest</B> talk<sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">edits 14:07, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have a copy of that one; it's a bit of a mixed anthology, but I shall rummage through it to see what is of use for our purposes. Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Troika Pottery
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Troika Pottery. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clock DVA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Seeking input
Your input would be greatly appreciated here. GabeMc (talk&#124;contribs)  02:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)