User talk:Toria20/Nothing Happens (album)

Peer review

General info:

Whose work are you reviewing? User:Toria20

Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Toria20/Nothing Happens (album)

Lead:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? -Yes, the lead includes a bit more information to be talked about in the rest of the article.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? -Yes

Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? -No

Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? -No

Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? -Yes, but I think it can do a lot more by talking a bit about the content to follow in the article.

Content:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? -Yes

Is the content added up-to-date? -Yes

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? -I definitely think there is still more information to be added about the album, such as its reception, its impact, etc.

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? -No

Tone and Balance:

Is the content added neutral? -Yes

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -No

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -No

Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? -No

Sources and References:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? -Yes

Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? -Yes

Are the sources current? -Yes

Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? -Yes, and no.

Check a few links. Do they work? -The YouTube link which is the 5th reference, does not work anymore.

Organization:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? -Yes. Very clear and easy to follow, especially for readers who are looking for quick information.

Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? -No

Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? -Yes

Overall evaluation:

Even though there is already a good amount of information about the article, I think that there is more to add regarding the background, its impact on fans and others, or how the members regarded it. Especially in the lead, there can definitely be a bit more information. Overall though, the draft seems to involve key information readers may be searching for, which is definitely what I would expect. Great work!