User talk:Tornadomiracle

Welcome!

Hello, Tornadomiracle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tornado probe upon an aircraft, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AngelOfSadness talk  13:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Tornado probe upon an aircraft


A tag has been placed on Tornado probe upon an aircraft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AngelOfSadness talk  13:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Tornado probe upon an aircraft
I deleted the article again as it still had the same problems as the first version: still hardly any context to determine what the article is about. I would highly recommend you create the article at User:Tornadomiracle/Tornado probe upon an aircraft and when you're finished writing, submit it to articles for creation. Many thanks. AngelOfSadness talk  13:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. Please don't make what appears to be a threat &mdash; it might be a political offense. I deleted your recent article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * Insofar as it was possible to understand the fairly rambling text, it appears to be original research
 * It was written in a promotional tone to advocate a particular point of view. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you, unless they state clearly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your article is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage of the centre in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Psychotornado test


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Psychotornado test, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

English
Your sumbission of Psychotornado test appears to be created from a machine translation of text in another language (probably Dutch, based on the subject of the article). Machine translations are notoriously bad, and in this case, the text it produced is rather meaningless. If you are not able to contribute meaningfully in English, you may wish to contribute to the Dutch language Wikipedia instead. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psycho-tornado test concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psycho-tornado test, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Should people not get aware of educative "tornado probes" upon aircrafts, which could get kept with the ecological backfiring of the pollution by the industrial revolution ever since 1981 October 6th near Moerdijk in Holland, instead of carry on following in such a spectacular "September 11th tragic" way with one Bijlmer-crash as in Amsterdam in 1992 on October 4th after the other on any capitol in the world, due to our blind ignoration and consequential denials of such horrible plane crash experiments?! My anthology of poetry "the Tornado Sword" by Maurice Tornadi (my professional nickname as a poet) got published this year on June 13th by United P.c. Verlag, and has become available online (perhaps as printed on demand) in over twenty websites like Amazon all over the world. There is no company behind it, but just myself as a private investigator of Nature, so I don't see, what kind of advertisement would be getting produces but a "proper" journal of my research as the law tends to request in most countries. Actually You are obstructing the law by keeping everything to yourself with Your Wikipedia, and might get prosecuted for it!

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psycho-tornado test


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psycho-tornado test requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://help.berberber.com/forum79/22489-who-going-publish-about-educative-tornado-bomb-probes-aircrafts-4.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 19:43, 18 October 2013 (UTC)