User talk:Toroloco

Speedy deletion of Speak Group, Int.
A tag has been placed on Speak Group, Int. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Deadly&forall;ssassin 09:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

New Message

 * Thanks for your note. I understand what you're asking, I think.  There are a number of different ways that we use to alert Wikipedia users to the idea that there are other concepts that go by the same name (disambiguation or "disambig").  Unfortunately, all those ways require that there is another article.  For instance, one common disambig is by posting a sentence at the top of the article, something like this: "This article is about Joe Smith the actor.  For Joe Smith the scientist, click here."  I'm afraid I don't know of any way of disambiguating a topic that doesn't have an article to accompany it.  As a matter of policy, we wouldn't create a sentence like the example above if there was no chance that there would ever be another article to link to -- it would leave users frustrated.  If it helps you any, I don't believe that anyone would mistake the subjects of the other articles for your group, but I can't think of any useful way to make that clear.  If there is something you think of that would do the job, please let me know and I'll certainly consider it.  Accounting4Taste: talk 15:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)