User talk:TorquilMacLeod

March 2015
Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Julius Malema seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 00:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
Weegeerunner (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Weegeerunner. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Also, I think you should read WP:NPOV before editing again at Julius Malema. Wikipedia maintains a neutral point of view, whereas your edits to this page did not.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Julius Malema. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Weegeerunner with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 00:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Weegeerunner. Amaury (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Weegeerunner. ''Your edits do not adere to WP:NPOV, they claim that Zuma is completely corrupt, and Julius Malema is amazing. That is not NPOV. Stop attacking User talk:Weegeerunner because they want to keep Wikipedia unbiased.'' Joseph2302 (talk) 00:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- GB fan 00:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. -- GB fan 00:48, 24 March 2015 (UTC)