User talk:Torygreen84

November 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Capital punishment in Australia has been reverted. Your edit here to Capital punishment in Australia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/986412794754704/?hc_location=ufi, https://www.facebook.com/Death-Penalty-is-needed-in-Australia-243466288999514/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Opinion Polling
Would you be able to explain why you changed the opinion polling section on the Conservative Party of Canada leadership election, 2017 to get rid of the section on Conservative Party members? If you cannot justify the edit it should be reversed. Newfoundlander&#38;Labradorian (talk) 12:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC) As I recall I didn't get rid of the section I only merged the TWO Conservative Party members Sections Sections. Torygreen84 (talk) 12:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

could somebody make a Template of Defunct Indian political parties Thanks because I don't know how to do it. Torygreen84 (talk) 03:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Requesting the creation of templates is done at Requested templates. Primefac (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm AJFU. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Donald Trump Supreme Court candidates, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AJFU 08:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Citizens' Movement (New Zealand)


The article Citizens' Movement (New Zealand) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence given that they meet WP:Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kashmir conflict, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christian politics in South Africa


The article Christian politics in South Africa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No actual content, seemingly abandoned draft."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

SSM
Please be a little more careful in adding MPs' views to their article. An article that already states that the subject opposes SSM does not then need another sentence saying they'll be voting no - of course they will. Also, be careful with the VoteCompass thing, which was an opt-in survey and thus not remotely statistically valid (we cannot categorically say "X electorate supports/opposes SSM", only "opt-in survey VoteCompass results from this electorate showed majority support/opposition ..."). Also, you added to a few articles (Jason Clare, Ed Husic, Chris Bowen) that they supported SSM while their electorates were majority against it, and this isn't even what VoteCompass said. Only one electorate, Maranoa, had a majority opposed. Blaxland, Chifley and McMahon just didn't get to 50% (there was a don't know option as well). Frickeg (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)