User talk:Toshiba1234

August 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bhala Khar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bhala Khar was changed by Toshiba1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956837 on 2021-08-21T23:51:02+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Portobello, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 23:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia 'Verifiability' content policy and vandalism concerns
Good morning Toshiba1234, I hope that you are well. It is a pleasure to meet you.

I refer to your edit to Cosmophyga (the Article) dated 22 August 2021 (the Edit). Specifically, I wish to bring your attention to the following statement: 'This organism is the only known ace organism in history. Scientists think it evolved as a result of a alck [sic] of breeding partners during the last Ice Age. If handled, the organism has the unfortunate consequence of creating a large rainbow appear on the person's forehead - should you experience this, call ***** ****** [a phone number redacted for privacy reasons] for a quick fix.' (the Statement).

I have decided to revert your Edit as I have determined on reasonable grounds that no citations to a reliable source were provided to verify the Statement and breached the 'Verifiability' content policy. I note that the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the contributor. Additionally, in my view, I am satisfied that the Statement may have been vandalism in nature due to the inclusion of a phone number irrelevant to the subject matter of the Article with respect to the context applied to the Statement beyond the doubt of good faith character and breached the 'Vandalism' conduct policy. As you are likely aware, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia by design. Accordingly, contributions must be of genuine educational value.

With respect to your previous warnings regarding vandalism, I wish to notify you that banning and blocking are administrative actions that are available to be imposed if necessary to prevent disruption to Wikipedia and enforce policies. I respectfully request that you stop your misconduct.

Wikipedia has a list of policies and guidelines available and I recommend that you review them when it is convenient for you for best practices when editing articles in the future. I appreciate your contribution to Wikipedia and hope that you enjoy your experience!

BB563780 (talk) 01:24, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 22 August 2021 (UTC)