User talk:Tossonhire

02-05-09,

From Tosson to Wikipedia,

I am very concerned that because this is about a very serious social reform and because it is against feminism that many narrow minded feminists get angry at me and at the pages I created such as the one who is very abusive by ridiculing and addressing me by the word "That guy". What sort of people are they and who are they? She felt free to laugh at me and stated "err". She throws abuse at me by stating that I made up a word and an institute. She must learn to speak to me with real respect. I am a very well recognized social reformer in Australia and I have the respect of the Prime Ministers of Australia, the former ones and the actual one. I have caused a lot of social changes to be made in Australia. Life is never the same again in Australia grace to my pioneering mission of social reform to eliminate the evil virus of feminism from the body of humanity and to put the human race back on the right track. I am also concerned that those people, at the other end at Wikipedia who correspond with me and want to delete my page, may be some militant feminists who make false allegations about my page that it isn't in accordance with the criteria while it is.

You stated that the page is short and that it should be verified. The page isn't short. The page isn't a web page or a web site and it isn't meant to be that at all. I formed the words “genderism and genderist” on the 15th of May, 2007. Those two words were not known and were not in any dictionary before that date. It is because I found that those two words of “genderism and genderist” are being used on the Internet on dates after the 15th of May, 2007, by writers, commentators and others working in the field of sociology, without the public having knowledge of  the definition of  those words, their author and their history, that I found it to be a must that in order to provide contribution and to help you in the operation of your Wikipedia that I create those pages.

Please note that the media and those who used my words “genderism and genderist” know their meaning or to say the least most of them know and the others may be guessing. This is because my correspondences to the Prime Ministers have continued for fourteen years until now. Copies of those correspondences are sent to the Leaders of Opposition and to the media. The Press office at the Prime Ministers’ Department allow the media access to them. All my articles and correspondences on the subject of the virus of feminism have echo in Canberra and many others get access to them and act on them. Those are the people who matter in Australia. You must pay very close attention to whom you are communicating with in here. It is not because I am not occupying a high post that you think that I am anybody. I am now in continuous correspondences with the Leader of Opposition, Mr Malcolm Turnbull who is very interested in my writing on the Australian National issues and who is inviting me to write on some very critical national issues. Of course I have all the documents and all the proofs to prove what I am stating in here.

Copies of those facsimiles to the Prime Minister are added only as verification and as a proof that I am the real author of the words. They also shed light on the background and the history of the words. All that is very important for the public to get real proper education. I thought that you are a serious encyclopaedia that is concerned with the facts. People are entitled to know the real facts. When people read the words “genderism and genderist” they are entitled to know their meaning and where and when they originated. Aren’t you after real knowledge and hard facts or are you after some feminist publications which are misleading to the human race and which are not worth the ink they are written on!!!

All in all I don’t understand you and I have real suspicions of the real motives of your objections to my pages. I have real suspicion also that racism on your part and religion too may be factors behind your objection and behind the ridicule of that ignorant woman who ridiculed me. Note also that I am irreligious and I am not one who wastes his time in religious superstition, in fighting others of different religions and of being occupied and totally consumed by racism. I absolutely have no time for all that rubbish that people are being fed and bombarded with on daily basis.

Conclusion is that all what I am doing is to define the words “genderism and genderist” and to provide the evidence, which were my facsimiles to the Prime Minister, proving the authenticity of the authorship of the words. If those two facsimiles to the Prime Minister are not to your satisfaction then I don’t mind removing them but the definition of the words must stay.

There are two pages. One is about the definition of genderism and the other is a repeat of it but it is about the definition of genderist.

Tossonhire (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Tosson

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Ridernyc (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The author of genderist and its definition
A tag has been placed on The author of genderist and its definition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 12:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Notability
Wikipedia policy is quite clear. What should happen is: I look forward to seeing the article in a few years' time. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * you establish the International Institute of Genderism
 * it becomes notable
 * someone else with no COI writes about it here.

Speedy deletion nomination of Tosson Mahmoud, the author of genderism and its definition
A tag has been placed on Tosson Mahmoud, the author of genderism and its definition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Passportguy (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)