User talk:TotalAbsurdity

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gerry Adams have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gerry Adams was changed by TotalAbsurdity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873079 on 2021-05-05T03:25:40+00:00

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to Gerry Adams. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Babegriev (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Gerry Adams, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn (talk) 03:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

How is this disruptive? I’m removing an editorial word (“falsely”) and adding a mitigating term (“so-called”).

This is basic journalistic stuff here. If we want wiki to survive we have to be professional. TotalAbsurdity (talk) 03:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

I would say the original contribution violated wikis neutral policy. Surely that is clear on observation of if TotalAbsurdity (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not journalism, we do not need "mitigating term" as we have to correctly report that Irish slave myth is clearly wrong. Wikipedia rules WP:FRINGE is clear on that, that theories that are clearly false needs to be reported as such. "So-called" infers that "Irish slave myth is true but people think it is false", which is clearly wrong. Wikipedia neutral policies didn't infer that we treat pseudoscience (and pseudohistorical) with the same weight as the one that has been proven by reliable sources. SunDawn (talk) 03:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

I get it. You want to run the table here and be judge jury and executioner of the “democratic encyclopedia.” If that’s the case, you’re no Britannica, guys. You’re just agenda- driven ideologues who are dooming this platform to oblivion.

Here’s a suggestion. Don’t be ideologues and instead think higher. Do you know how great Wikipedia could be if all people trusted it? Bc they definitely don’t now. And this is why. TotalAbsurdity (talk) 04:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

“Wikipedia isn’t journalism.”

Are you in any way self aware? Did you really just say that?

You are thus not in the business of letting people think for themselves. You are in the business of telling people what to think. Who are you to take a position on anything whatsoever? Are you experts on the universe? Are you kidding me? You joined 8 years ago or whatever and garnered sufficient power to bend people to your will. That’s authoritarianism, my friend.

You are ideologues with agendas that align squarely with how you feel. You are therefore not only not authorities on anything per se, you are yellow journalists using the veneer of an objective Wikipedia to further your (uninspired) visions for the world.

In short, you’re little people who happened on a big platform. Take my word for it: it won’t last. TotalAbsurdity (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification
FDW777 (talk) 06:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Also the Gerry Adams article, as well as other articles relating to The Troubles, Irish Nationalism and British Nationalism in relation to Ireland, is under a 1-revert-restriction, meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period. FDW777 (talk) 06:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)}

FDW777 (talk) 06:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Tale of the Dog (documentary, 2021


Hello, TotalAbsurdity. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Tale of the Dog (documentary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)