User talk:TotallyEthical/sandbox/Antinous Mondragone

I went back and looked at the current state of the article on Wikipedia before reviewing the process you made, which is very evident when you compare them. I really like the organizational structure that you added to the article, all of the information was limited to one unorganized section in the original. There are a few errors in some of the sentences, which make it a little bit unclear and could benefit from some revision, which seems to be part of the original article. I really like the historian perspective section of your article, I think that is a very interesting point of view to include, what historians have said about the piece. I can see that the lead section needs additional information. The article remains neutral, has a clear structure, and the references are credible. Overall, I think you have a good starting point, I just think that more information would overall improve this article. Lrsteele103 (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)