User talk:TotallyNotEtreo

Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012 GA Review
I saw you were doing the GA review for Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. Thank you for your time and efforts. I hope that rather the articles passes or fails, this will provide a means to further improve the article. If you have any questions, please ask. I am more then willing to make suggested improvements as part of the review process. Casprings (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. Having read the article, I am confident that I will be able to pass it, it is now just the formality of writing the review up. TotallyNotEtreo 19:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If you do pass it, could I ask your eventual thoughts on taking it to WP:FA?  Where to work on it and improve it for that standard?  Casprings (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Gladly. I certainly think it's capable reaching the lofty heights of FA, with some minor modifications. I'll go through that when I finish the review though. TotallyNotEtreo 19:48, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I was actually rereading the article and thinking about what to add.  I might just submit it and see what happens.  That said, thanks for the review.  Glad to continue to work the article up the quality scale and your point on adding info from the GOP is very useful.  Casprings (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!Face-smile.svg
Nice to see you at the Teahouse! I hope you like to be here,if you have any question (s),feel free to leave me a message,and I will respond soon! Carliitaeliza  TALK  23:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Fibonacci number GA nomination
Hallo, I noticed you have nominated Fibonacci number and say on your user page you intend to nominate other articles for GA and FA. However, it does say on the main GA page that where the nominator has not been involved in editing, they should consult with other editors of the article concerned. Have you done that? It's always best to check, not only for politeness but because things may be changing and work may be in progress. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:18, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I did not. But I will in future, thanks for the advice. TotallyNotEtreo 20:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

DYK RfC

 * As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat&#124;Contributions 02:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche
The article Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Anarchism and Friedrich Nietzsche for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Czar -- 04:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive
{| |}

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive
It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:


 * This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
 * Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
 * The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
 * An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive
The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive
Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497 --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup
Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012 reassessment
You reviewed Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012 I placed it for reassessment because some editors doubted its status. The link can be found here. Casprings (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)