User talk:Totalpoliticsuk

Welcome!
Hi Totalpoliticsuk! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Celestina007 (talk) 01:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Jason Okundaye moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jason Okundaye, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 01:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You do realize that two third of the sources you used were flagged as problematic by Wikipedia I was in the process of ridding them all and marking the page as reviewed but your quickly reverted my edits which were intended to help you. I now perceive either COI or UPE editing. That article will never be published on Wikipedia until you disclose your COI with the subject of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

What is COI or UPE editing? Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 02:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Undisclosed Paid Editing
Hello Totalpoliticsuk. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Jason Okundaye, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Totalpoliticsuk. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 01:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I’m definitely not paid to write for anyone — this a completely baseless accusation. Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 01:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Baseless? You really think I don’t have off wiki proof? Call my bluff and see what happens. The only way that article is ever going to accepted is through the afc process. Celestina007 (talk) 02:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

You have proof that I’ve been paid to make an article that I have no financial links to? Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 02:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I don’t have any issue with the article going through the process. I don’t know why any of what I’ve done means I must be paid. That’s a conclusion I’m confused by? Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 02:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

I’m still waiting for the proof Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 13:08, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry warning
Hello, Totalpoliticsuk, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 01:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I’ve not been on wiki long so I’m very intrigued by the suggestion this account is corroborating with other accounts? Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 01:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Don’t you dare insult my intelligence, you know how it is, either you comply with our rules or I see to it that you get indef blocked from editing here ever again. Celestina007 (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I haven’t insulted your intelligence, I joined wiki with the intention of improving areas that appear to be lacking so I’m perplexed by your assertions. I haven’t intentionally broken any rules. I deliberately looked at other pages to make sure the formatting was close to other pages.  Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 02:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have been entrusted with sensitive off wiki material and we both know you aren’t a new editor so quit Fucking with me. If you continue down this part then you are not just looking for a block but an outright ban. Don’t push your luck. Celestina007 (talk) 02:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I don’t know why you’re swearing at me. I haven’t been rude, I was just shocked by some of your accusations. Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Regardless of whether Totalpoliticsuk is a paid editor or not I think you can tone it down a bit here, no need to be so aggressive. Sam Walton (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Well said Sam.
 * A current news event has lead me here after seeing something posted by TotalPolitics...
 * However, seeing what This user/Mentor @Celestina007 has said is disgusting. Not sure who she thinks she is??!
 * Wikipedia doesnt toxic people like her.
 * Happily, it seems that she has given up on Wikipedia looking at her talk page. Which I believe is for the best. 90.246.39.43 (talk) 23:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Okundaye
Hello, Totalpoliticsuk

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jason Okundaye for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jason_Okundaye&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Great, thanks. I think someone edited at the same time. Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 02:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Okundaye


A tag has been placed on Jason Okundaye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ GB fan 09:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jason Okundaye
Hello, Totalpoliticsuk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jason Okundaye, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm 10mmsocket. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Helen Ball, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Good point, reliable source added. Totalpoliticsuk (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Seen it. Fantastic, thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)