User talk:Tothebeat.ceo

Re: Electronic direct marketing
It just is. Wikipedia is not a place to publish new information, and doing so is original research. If your article is "The first published definition Electronic Direct Marketing (eDM) as a stand alone marketing principle" [sic] and "A sophisticated model for subscriber engagement is still in development", then it does not belong on Wikipedia. Graham 87 05:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Graham did you read the definition? Anyway I hope you can review the amendments and help to ensure the topic is correct moving forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tothebeat.ceo (talk • contribs)


 * No, I will not. Go through the articles for creation process and declare any conflicts of interest that you have. Graham 87 06:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, acronyms should never be in article titles. Graham 87 06:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Graham how is a published article about a definition about me or a company that published the definition .....let me see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows seems to be about bill gates and microsoft..... PLEASE explain.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tothebeat.ceo (talk • contribs)

I am a new publisher to Wikipedia and I feel 87 Graham87 is bullying me. The article reads well and corrects a huge gap in a definition. Does Graham have a conflict of interest? Seems illogical? Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tothebeat.ceo (talk • contribs)


 * Go through the articles for creation process - or better yet, don't, because a neologism invented by one bunch of spammers is not a suitable subject for an article. Pinkbeast (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You have a Conflict of Interest in regards to getting this published, and the way you have been going about it is wrong. Usually, you should wait until someone else decides your notable and creates an article about it. Or, you use requested articles, or the Articles for creation process which ensures that other editors can check the work. This is the only way you can do it atm, and even then, as Pinkbeast said, it probably wouldn't get published. No-one is bullying you. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tothebeat.ceo/Electronic direct marketing eDM


A tag has been placed on User:Tothebeat.ceo/Electronic direct marketing eDM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97RBx2R-Lmg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 08:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Tothebeat.ceo, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Graham was completely incorrect in hie eDM assessment - you only need google the term electronic direct marketing and yoiu will see that Google put the term I was will to donate to Wikipedia in it's prize spot. There are ove 300 member of the informal association.

Graham has a personal vendetta against a fellow West Australian doing well. I am sol please to please to be back in the country, perhaps a coffee graham and lets figure out you vendetta.

Here's the thing - I left this in 2014 because a blind man who had nothing better to do then to pick on successful local entrepreneurs started attacking me and the simple fact I was learning Wikipedia.

I tried you sandbox process and I am sorry I failed.

I really am not here for self promotion and have evidence to contrary given I have made plenty of amendments using a different name which I will never divulge, but graham has not persecuted me on those.

So Graham yes I do get it as my other posts help billions of internet users and you will never know how. Wake up mate and stop being a troll, perhaps offer some help rather than the aggressive racist approach - because I can tell you you are white and you are persecuting a colored guy from your home town, I have heard about you, yes!

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 15:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You really don't get it, do you? Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself or any of your ideas. To this end I have deleted your user pages and blocked you indefinitely for not being here to contribute to the encyclopedia. Graham 87 15:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Further to my claims of racism, no acknowledgement of indigenous land rights and ownership and anti-indigenous, anti-semitic rhetoric. Oombulgurri Community, Western Australia, opens with no historical fact post that of the Whiteman invading this country, of which Graham's ancestry was one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyndham,_Western_Australia a primarily indigenous population with the traditional land owners still residing in the town, nothing from graham. If the wikipedia community ius blind to the fact that a western australian has only 3 attempts at indigenous dictionary style attempts to rewrite history "Graham Style" and rewards people like this then I am glad I am blocked because that is disgusting. Take down this racist publisher. I will need to take this to the elders and have them decided what to do. Being discriminated against in our country is no longer acceptable.


 * Well first of, if you have a problem with Wikipedia content you should discuss it based on sourcing from reliable sources, without all this rhetoric that has no place in an encyclopedia, and seek WP:dispute resolution. If you wish to have any hope of being unblocked. You will remove this legal threat. Please see WP:NLT. Thanks  Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

I can not remove anything until I take this to the elders, so you are publishing in our country now.
 * With all respect to your elders, if you do not withdraw your legal threat, you cannot be unblocked for editing Wikipedia.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:20, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It would have been helpful if you had explained the reason for asking for a check. I had to read the garbage well above and assume it's because "I have made plenty of amendments using a different name which I will never divulge, but graham has not persecuted me on those"? I see no evidence of socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)