User talk:Totodu74

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Totodu74, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! mgiganteus1 (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style
 * Damned, in 4 years I have never had a talk page here ! So much for that. I'm kidding, thank's ;) Totodu74 (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Red Warbler range map
Putting a range map in the taxobox is a long-standing convention here on the English wikipedia. I'm not going to immediately revert this, but I have requested comment on the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Birds page, if you'd like to contribute your reasons for changing this. MeegsC | Talk 11:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Hand-coding
Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Siberian Nuthatch
While I can see that this might be a candidate for species status, apart from the quoted paper I haven't myself come across any indication that species status has been accepted by any relevant national or international body or major secondary source. I'm not objecting to the article, but it would be helpful if it was supported by references other than to just one primary source, cheers  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Jim, I have no opinion about how you should consider it on the Wikipedia in English. What I know is that the French language one decided to follow IOC classification, in which S. arctica is recognized as a true species. They follow Zink et al. 2006, Red'kin & Konovalova 2006 and Collar 2007. I am quite neutral about whether it's accurate or not to treat this taxon as a species. Let me know what you think about this. :) Totodu74 (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * By the way, I take here the time to say how much I am happy to see your great work on European species (and others). Sooner or later, I likely will translate the Eurasian Nuthatch's one into French. :) Totodu74 (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * One more thing, coming up to my mind, you could be interested by hybrids between subspecies and close related species. Hybrids in Nuthatches are summarized here, based on the McCarthy book Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World. Kind regards, Totodu74 (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, one of my refs is actually in French, so that's a start (: As I say, I think giving it full species status may be jumping the gun a bit, but as long as you don't mind it staying as a ssp at the main article for the time being, I don't mind it being a full sp at yours. All is good. I've seen the hybrid page, but HBW recognises amurensis as a valid ssp, so no problem at the moment. I might add it as footnote at some stage   Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  16:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I absolutely don't mind if you consider it is better to treat it as a ssp. HBW is at least as relevant as IOC for birds taxonomy, actually. For amurensis, I know it's often treated as a valid subspecies, I'm just reflecting what McCarthy is saying, using a conditional tense :) Totodu74 (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * For dating of different clades, do you havve access to the Pasquet's phylogeny from 2 weeks ago? I can send you this one. For example the family is given from early Miocene (for now you only talk about S. senogalliensis from lower Miocene). This is a great pulication for the small Nuthatches world ^^ Regards, Totodu74 (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Przevalski's Nuthatch
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Beautiful Nuthatch
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Masked Shrike
Sorry, should both have been 219, fixed now Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oncopus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICZN ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Oncopus check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Oncopus?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Introducing myself
Hey, I notice you've worked on some bat articles lately. Thanks for making the improvements and creating missing articles! I also work on bat content regularly. If you're interested, there's a loose association of editors, as well as resources, project statistics, missing articles, and more, at the bats work group. Anyway, I'm sure I'll be seeing you around! Enwebb (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019
Hi, we are organizing the 2019 edition of WikiScienceCompetition, also in Switzerland, if you are interested let me know. I would like you to be a juror and I am drafting a financial plan for WMCH.

Also, we are creating a new User group that acts as a global coordination project on meta for scientific subjects. See m:Science Wiki User Group. It will take some months to shape it but we are very motivated. Specifically, one of the main target of the group are people with an academic degree and/or who are involved in scientific research in real life, we want to reach out to the scientific community through that way. Please join us, especially if you have a sufficient knowledge meta since we are still building it (we will translate the page in the future when its identity is stable). Every comment is welcome (see the talk page). One of the topic of this UG is to provide an official support also for event such as WSC in the future.--Alexmar983 (talk) 23:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your edits in Natural History Museum of Geneva


Please explain how Louis Jurine was associated with the museum, preferably in his bio and a short comment in this list. Now the bio says that his collection is at the museum. When I was creating this list, I found than collections of a large number of people are stored at the museum, many of them donated posthumously. Meaning that this fact does not automatically mean an association of this person with the museum. Loew Galitz (talk) 22:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

 * Thank you very much for your kind message! I wish you all the best too for the end of the year, and thank you for your help with illustrations. The last two images you(?) were able to free are great!! Cheers, Totodu74 (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Those images are beautiful, so without hesitation, I requested them immediately in the comment section, but unfortunately for Yunnan nuthatch, I can't convince them . 2001:4455:1A9:E100:557A:CBB9:4DCF:663E (talk) 00:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * We'll have to be patient for this one, but meanwhile I have a very fine drawing I have specially ordered few months back. I need to take the time of taking it out of its frame and digitalize it on a good scanner some day. Totodu74 (talk) 00:40, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Isn't that tiresome? I requested another 2 images of the Yunnan nuthatch, but with a different owner this time and not a decent image like the 2 we've uploaded recently. Maybe there's a chance. I think I'm done translating nuthatches articles. As you can see, I'm having trouble citing ref 5 at White-browed nuthatch and especially nearly all Krüper's nuthatch, but without your content in French, this article would never be expanded that much. Keep up the good work on there :D. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:983C:A642:9150:905C (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Krüper's nuthatch
Hey, you might want to check that article on your french wiki. The species was said to be "least concern" from the source. Happy New Year. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:79BD:A265:FAB6:97B5 (talk) 04:19, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Diptychophora galvani
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Diptychophora galvani you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Diptychophora galvani
The article Diptychophora galvani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Diptychophora galvani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)