User talk:Touchdown Turnaround

And I refer you to this page http://www.users.bigpond.com/J_fersOffice/sample.htm and this page http://ospa.utdallas.edu/Publications/VIG/10plurals.htm stating if a singular possessive proper noun ends in "s" to just add the apostrophe.

Why have you changed my informations about Hellogoodbye (they have changed the name of their band) http://www.myspace.com/hellogoodbye by 90.129.3.229 (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at User_talk:90.129.3.229

Excuse me but why do you remove my website link, I'm proud of my website and I think it will be very useful for people. Steve
 * Replied at [] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindbergh2002 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disruptive Edit Warning
Please refrain from your arbitrary and undiscussed reverts as you have been doing in the Stoney Point Airfield page. This is counterproductive and clearly not in the spirit for which Wikipedia was intended. If you have comments, please make them in the article's talk page prior to taking unilateral action. This has been brought to your attention on more than one occasion. Thank you for your understanding. Gladtohelp (talk) 03:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)gladtohelp

Please revisit
Please revisit Stoney Point Airfield and Articles for deletion/Stoney Point Airfield. The article has gone through expansion and additional sources have been added. Thank you!--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Template:US-airport
Hi, Stifle. The change you just granted to the protected template was based on a campaign that's been going on almost exclusively by single use accounts and meat puppets that have been trying to get their new/commercial web sites in the template. Touchdown Turnaround (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I figured that. Is there anything else I need to do? Stifle (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

US-Airport Template
Hi Touchdown Turnaround. Well it looks like you and I are the last ones standing in this debate on the US-Airport template.

Just to let you know right off the bat, though I am a SUA I do not work for any of the companies we have discussed on the US-Airport Template page. Actually, I work as an SEO Expert for a travel website, which is how I found AirNav, FlightAware, etc…

Here is my point, because Wikipedia has a high Google ranking, any site listed on Wikipedia, such as AirNav and FlightAware gets a high ranking and additional traffic. AirNav has over 3,000 links on Wikipedia, which in my opinion, is considered spamming. This is not fair to competitors to AirNav when they can not be listed in the template and can not remove AirNav from the template. I suggest making this situation fair by using government websites, such as the FAA. The External Links Guidelines say that we should try and keep external links to a minimum, which we would be following if we just use the FAA website.

To close I don’t really care what sites are being used but if you’re going to use commercial external links that give an advantage to any of them, you should at least let everyone else on the template benefit from it. If you are not then just use a government site that is not going to profit from it and be done with it.

What is your opinion? - Neilh89 (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)