User talk:Toufikbiswas1

New Bhagirathi Bridge moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, New Bhagirathi Bridge, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the button atop the article. Silikonz 💬 14:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Berhampore Court railway station, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:New Bhagirathi Bridge 2
Hello, Toufikbiswas1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Bhagirathi Bridge 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:New Bhagirathi Bridge 2


Hello, Toufikbiswas1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New Bhagirathi Bridge 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Pinakpani. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. ''sorry to inform you, that you are deleting the Bold heading of introduction, as you have done here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lalgola_railway_station&diff=prev&oldid=1138437046 this is not the wiki format of railway station article. Pls make constructive edit.'' Pinakpani (talk) 16:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Stop undoing these changes. Your knowledge seems very limited. Thank you very much. Toufikbiswas1 (talk) 16:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You have completely deleted the reliable references while reverting the edit in Berhampore Court railway station this amounts to vandalism. You are hereby requested to behave politely while making reply. All of our knowledge is very limited, but we the wikipedians are trying to contribute jointly on the basis of refences and according to the approved wiki format. Pinakpani (talk) 11:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I have requested User:Toufikbiswas1 not to edit disruptively which violates the wiki format heading of railway station article. continuous reverting may cause edit war. While undoing the previous edit, contributor vandalised the article Berhampore Court railway station, deleted the references! I'm drawing the kind attention of User:Liz & User:Yamaguchi先生 with a request to take appropriate steps to stop these disruptive edits, as you both had already messaged this user in earlier occasions. Pinakpani (talk) 09:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

This message is to you, Toufikbiswas1, and to you. You are both engage in an edit war. I don't care if both of you think you're a million % correct and the other is 0% correct. The edit warring itself is the disruptive problem here. This ends. If either of you persist in undoing the edits of the other without continuing discussion to resolve these issues, I will be issuing blocks (or another admin may) to stop the disruption. Dispute resolution does not include edit warring as a means to an end. This ends. NOW. I hope I've been clear. If not, then please ask questions. Either of you continuing as you have been is unacceptable. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Kindly see my earlier msg pls. I have already stopped editing this page and will not edit a single word further. And I requested to the user not to delete the references. Previously one admin has also warned him reagarding disruptive edit. Anyway, I have no personal issue on this page, and I rest my case here sir, Thank you. Pinakpani (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)