User talk:Toushiro/Archive 1

Da‘wat dhul-‘Ashīra - Summoning the Family
Salam bro,

Thanks for your attempt to improve Succession to Muhammad. However, we have some criteria which you've neglected. Please compare it with Ali. In brief, almost all of your sources are primary(See:WP:PRIMARY). Adding your judgment like ''! At the least, this shows that the appointment of ‘Ali b. Abí Tãlib was clear and explicit, not just implied.'' is against WP:NPOV and WP:OR.-- Seyyed(t-c) 02:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Nice!
Salaam, good job on all the work you've been doing. -- Enzuru 01:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak!
Salaam and Eid Mubarak, I had actually thought we could make that template just for Twelvers, but I guess you're right, we should just make it a generic Imam template (for Twelver and Ismaili only though, the Zaidi conception is way too different). I'll fix things up and give you an update. -- Enzuru 14:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * After working with it, I decided against a generic template, but I did make the changes you asked for. -- Enzuru 15:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me, I think the issue has been fixed now, but I can't check because I'm having some cryptic cache issues. -- Enzuru 03:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello
I always feel so sad that you have no user page... :-( ناهد/(Nåhed) speak! 06:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL, literally an hour later without seeing your comment I created one for him! -- Enzuru 20:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Well I put some stuff on it now (nowhere near as interesting as yours though o_O ..lol) Toushiro (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Muhammad al-Baqir has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Japanese Muslim
are you one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Al-Zaidi (talk • contribs) 01:13, 30 October 2008


 * I'll leave that for you to decide =P ~ Toushiro (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just asking because I came across a book about Muslims in Japan, most who are ethnically Japanese converted during the time of the Ottomans. So i was just curious if you would be in a position to provide information.  I care little for prejudice which is why i find your quote "I'll leave that for you to decide" rather unhelpful.Al-Zaidi (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah, I think he's just the byproduct of the Japanese fad that has swept through the West. Look at his userboxes, they're filled with Internet culture. -- Enzuru 05:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Feedback
What do you think on how I've changed the Imam templates around? Start at Hasan ibn Ali and work your way around to see how it is organized. -- Enzuru 02:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * whoa, really nice work I cant think up any suggestions at the moment though.. >_<


 * I was actually about to ask for your help keeping an eye on the dajjal page. Basically, I added some information and all of it kept being removed for petty reasons, so I was just as forceful in keeping my info there (i think i kinda overdid it, and showed how little i know about wikipedia policy still, but hey~). Things have cooled down now, and most of the info was kept - but what concerns me is a response on the talk page that was just added and removed. Toushiro (talk) 03:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, Template:Ali, Template:Fatimah, and Template:Husayn now follow the look of Template:Muhammad. But, back to what you said (leave responses on my talk page so I know, the only reason I came back here was to add what I just said), you need to note that the Twelver are the second largest single group in Islam, whether this person likes it or not. -- Enzuru 04:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Do me a favor, since I really dislike doing this (I did it with Ismail ibn Jafar and Muhammad ibn Ismail, that's enough for one lifetime). Could you put the Template:infobox_Imams thing like we have with the early Imams on this article: Shi'a view of Ali. Though, if you don't want to, I could do it eventually. Like, one day. -- Enzuru 22:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * What infobox do you want to add? Might as well just use the royal one, Ali is using that one too. -- Enzuru 04:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That is purposeful for Template:Infobox_Imams, however it has been kept in Template:Infobox_Twelver and modified in Tempalte:Infobox_Ismaili. -- Enzuru 05:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't put Imam in the big name with the name, just put their name. -- Enzuru 05:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * sry.. >__< ~ Toushiro (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Avicenna's notability
Please vote on this issue. Thanks! -- Enzuru 03:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

User:2bvbesti3 & al.
Sorry I'm not more responsive, I'm not that active right now on Wikipedia but anti-Shi'ah screeds do tend to refocus my attention...  Ogress  smash!  20:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm a linguaphile, what can I say?  Ogress  smash!  04:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Shah Cheragh
Hi, Good catch. There are many similar looking mausoleums with the famous pear-shaped dome in Shiraz and I can see how distinguishing between them can be confusing.

The picture below is tomb of Seyyed Mir Ahmad:

Both are part of the same complex named Shah Cheragh. (Marmoulak (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC))

Re: Shah Cheragh 2
I don't think the pictures below are from Mausoleum of Ali Ibn-e-Hamzeh:

They are pictures of the interior of Shah Cheragh as seen in this pic as well.

FYI, here are all the mausoleums in Shiraz with the pear-shaped dome, that look like Shah Cheragh but are different:

Mausoleum of Ali Ibn-e-Hamzeh:

img1 Img2

Mausoleum of Seyyed Taj Al-Din Qarib:

img1 img2

Mausoleum of Seyyed Ala'iddin Husayn:

img1 img2

Marmoulak (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)