User talk:Toussaint/Archive 4

Merging Podcasting & Aggregators templates without discussion?
Toussaint, you shouldn't have merged Podcasting & Aggregators templates without discussion. A lot of people worked hard building these templates, now their contribution history is also lost, and they should've had a say in this decison. --IncidentFlux [ TalkBack 10:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Furthermore, this gigantic one size fits all template, does not fit all. How does the 'Podcasting' and 'Blogs and blogging' section fit with 'Aggregators'? --IncidentFlux [ TalkBack 11:11, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Because they all address the same subject, bar none. Syndication of content on the Web is almost always associated with blogs, podcasting and aggregation of feeds from blogs and podcasting. Finally, if you have any extra fingers, I can count the many linked articles duplicated in all two and/or three templates, starting with RSS, Atom, Web feed, Web syndication, Broadcatching, etc. Splitting them back to their originals is only a needless repetition and outspreading of effort on a number of articles which are linked to some tightly related subject matter, and its simply less disorganizing to bring all three subject matter (two of which are highly dependent or featuring upon the other as a vital application component) under a larger, more concise template. Finally, I have no problem with reorganizing templates as long I can be highly sure that the templates are related. --Toussaint (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree that some of it can be merged, but not all of it. Currently content creation areas (podcasting, blogging) have been merged with the technological aspects (Aggregators). It's like merging types of television programs (serials, sitcoms etc) with types of televsion sets (CRT, Plasma, LCD etc). Sure they're related but they shouldn't be merged.


 * This template now looks too big and overwhelming and users will be deterred to use this template to navigate. It'll look better if Web syndication has Applications, Podcasting, Blogs and blogging. Aggregators has Technologies stays separate in another template.--IncidentFlux [ TalkBack 01:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)


 * We could split it in half like you just said, but I feel very uneasy about the Technology section going with either-or template: going with Aggregators would separate Technology from the applications of such syndication and distribution, while going with Applications would separate the Technology from how it is received (although most of the Technology takes place server-side, while Aggregators only receive the content, thus placing Technology more in the Application camp anyway). --Toussaint (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks alright, the 'Technologies section' is more relevant to the 'Web syndication' side. As you said, since its server side. This concludes our broadcast... :-) --IncidentFlux [ TalkBack 21:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bookmark toolbar


The article Bookmark toolbar has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 22:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mayor of Dar es Salaam


The article Mayor of Dar es Salaam has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * pointless list of mostly redlinks

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Closedmouth (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:American-Wikipedias
Template:American-Wikipedias has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 15:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:Current Nigerian Senators - Deletion?
I see that this template, which you created, has been flagged for deletion. I noticed because I just started an article on Ike Ekweremadu (still very much work in progress) and saw the template linked to him. But none of articles on senators listed in this template include the template, so it is an orphan. I am not sure if there is great value in the template, but if it is kept the relevant articles should include it. In what scenario would you see it being useful to a reader? Aymatth2 (talk) 13:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I renamed this to Template:Nigerian Senators of the 6th National Assembly. My reasoning is that it would be useful to have a similar Template:Nigerian Senators of the 5th National Assembly, and after the next election to have a Template:Nigerian Senators of the 7th National Assembly. That way, senators who are not reelected still show in the old template. Senators who are reelected can have a template for each assembly they belong to (it now loads collapsed, so would look o.k.) Comments? Aymatth2 (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

davfs2
Hi Toussaint, awhile back, you copy-edited the davfs2 article. It's now going through an AfD... If you have time could you help with the article? I did some of the latest work trying to improve it, but it may be insufficient to keep it around. Please help if you can/care. Thanks! --Mokhov (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Virtual file server


The article Virtual file server has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article is an advertisement for the four listed products. The term "virtual file server" is not WP:notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UncleDouggie (talk) 04:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:NG state navigation box
A tag has been placed on Template:NG state navigation box requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. RL0919 (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Navigators USA
Navigators USA needs to be improved to show notability. It needs sources outside it's website and the UUA. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 12:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Nigerian Senator Templates
See Nuhu Aliyu, scroll to the foot, for the way these have evolved - a series now. I am still not quite sure what the value is, but I think there is some value. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CourtsSweden
Template:CourtsSweden has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gabbe (talk) 08:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current TDs
Template:Current TDs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:46, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Mozilla Taiwan was created and but might be deleted!
The Mozilla Taiwan article was created from a red-link in the template you created Template:Mozilla. However the article is now up for speedy deletion. If you wish to help save this article please help to make a case for it in the talk page perhaps indicating why you created that red-link in the first place as its existence in the template was the sole reason I created the article. Thorenn (talk) 04:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Too late, its gone. Thorenn (talk) 05:21, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HUUmanists


The article HUUmanists has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 00:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Michael and Peter Spierig
Template:Michael and Peter Spierig has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ~ ς ح   д r   خ є  ~ 03:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

2010 Haiti earthquake
Please do not remove cited material such as you did in 2010 Haiti earthquake. Thank you. --Moni3 (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I moved the material to a separate article as linked inside the original. --Toussaint (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You removed the entire section. If a split is warranted, the parent article should retain a cited summary of what is covered in the subtopic. Please announce what you are doing on the article talk page. People will help you and may have different ideas. Please use edit summaries. This article changes very rapidly and its quality should be maintained. Thank you. --Moni3 (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I did split into a new article, and a split is needed because it will pile up with new information in the coming weeks about the status of rescue efforts. Most recent major event articles (Honduras, Iran, etc.) split their timeline sections into new articles because they will continue to grow with new efforts recorded by the day in the press (as the "article changes very rapidly"). I'm trying to write the summary in the main article at present. Thanks. --Toussaint (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree that a split is probably warranted, but the parent article should retain a summary with the hatnote, instead of a blank section with a hatnote. Most readers will go to the parent article first and removing all the information does them a disservice and looks awful. Please develop a one or two paragraph summary of what the timeline discusses with full citations, then place it in 2010 Haiti earthquake with a hatnote directing readers to the main article. Thank you. --Moni3 (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Can you acknowledge please that you are working on citing the summary you placed in the parent article? Otherwise, I will revert back to the cited section. An uncited section is as bad as a blank section. --Moni3 (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Toussaint! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 34 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Noxolo Kiviet -
 * 2) Femi Otedola -
 * 3) Giles Mutsekwa -
 * 4) Lauren Lazin -
 * 5) Dan Biron -
 * 6) Anthony Gubbay -
 * 7) Liu Zhihua -
 * 8) Themba Godi -
 * 9) Chris Liebenberg -
 * 10) Molefi Sefularo -


 * 11. Alexander Ogomudia
 * 12. Paul Antoine Bien-Aimé
 * 13. Beatrice Marshoff
 * 14. Mahamat Hissene
 * 15. Denis Kalume Numbi
 * 16. Tony Hall (supervisor)
 * 17. Vincent Eze Ogbulafor
 * 18. Sarah Adebisi Sosan
 * 19. Misheck Kagurabadza
 * 20. Leonard Ramatlakane
 * 21. Baudoin Liwanga
 * 22. Emmanuel Leku Apuobo
 * 23. Trésor Kapuku Ngoy
 * 24. Samuel Sitta
 * 25. Célestin Cibalonza Byaterana
 * 26. José Makila Sumanda
 * 27. Pius Msekwa
 * 28. Dick Wathika
 * 29. Dudley Perkins
 * 30. Koloso Sumaili
 * 31. Kimbembe Mazunga
 * 32. Paul Denis
 * 33. Marc Bazin

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Closure of Sango Wikipedia
There is currently a second proposal for the Closure of Sango Wikipedia. You are encouraged to voice your opinion regarding this matter. --202.36.179.66 (talk) 04:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Kely Bastien
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Kely Bastien. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit summary
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.  Swarm  Talk 01:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Seriously, Toussaint. Please use an edit summary.  Swarm  Talk 23:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:2010 Haiti earthquake
Hey, perhaps you could chime in at Template talk:2010 Haiti earthquake about the scope of this template.  Grsz 11  02:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Templates, default closed setting
Hi Toussaint, I would like to have templates like this one: Template:Namakwa District Municipality to be default closed, like this one: Template:Pixley ka Seme District Municipality but don't know how to do it. What is the code that does this? Just thought that the auxiliary info contained in them need not be displayed explicitly in the articles. JMK (talk) 09:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Troy Duffy
Template:Troy Duffy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Mike   Allen   02:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Goel Ratzon
I have nominated Goel Ratzon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Goel Ratzon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  MBisanz  talk 07:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Michael and Peter Spierig
Template:Michael and Peter Spierig has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Jinja Honcho
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Jinja Honcho. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Association of Shinto Shrines. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Association of Shinto Shrines - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. armagebedar (talk) 02:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries and Template:Copied attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. --Closeapple (talk) 05:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ethan Hawke
Template:Ethan Hawke has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corruption in South Africa


The article Corruption in South Africa has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Contentious. Unsourced. POV. Original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  SilkTork  *YES! 11:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Navigators USA


A tag has been placed on Navigators USA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Abductive (reasoning) 00:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2006 South African municipal election
Template:2006 South African municipal election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. htonl (talk) 01:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dudley Perkins
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dudley Perkins. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Dudley Perkins. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of computer system manufacturers
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of computer system manufacturers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of computer system manufacturers 2. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United Liberal Associations


The article United Liberal Associations has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I can't find significant coverage for this organization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 22:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The google hits that I found didn't show significant coverage. Also, all of the sources in the Dutch article is just links to the official sites of the companies that are part of the organization. Joe Chill (talk) 02:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of United Liberal Associations
I have nominated United Liberal Associations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/United Liberal Associations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 02:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

You may be interested in
Articles for deletion/Apple.com. Thanks,  — fetch ·  comms   02:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPIPNA
Template:WPIPNA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 23:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)