User talk:Tove Jensen

Welcome
I have read your comments on the Tove Jensen article. If you could please specify what, exactly, you would like to change, and why, I'll be glad to help you improve the article. Generally speaking, Wikipedia strives to only publish verifiable facts (you can read the article here for detail on this) and does not allow original research. You -- or any other user -- are free to edit the article on Tove Jensen, and it is in the best interests of our users that articles are high quality and accurate. Welcome to Wikipedia, and I'm sorry that you find the article upsetting. Hopefully, we can continue to improve it.

Thanks, Nandesuka 17:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The article
I saw your note, and I have rewritten the page to get rid of any point of view issues and unverifiable information. Although I am unfamiliar with you as a subject and previously had not edited your page, I have cut down on the items you mentioned in your objection, and I removed anything that may be objectionable. Thanks for your understanding, and on behalf of many here, I apologize if this article has caused you or your family any discomfort. Wikipedia administrator, --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 19:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Any further objections?
Do you have any further objections to the article as it stands now? Any inaccuracies that you see? Any other films or magazine appearances you would like to add perhaps? ALKIVAR &trade; 00:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you all for responding so quickly. By removing the "conjecture" from the original page, it is now more factual rather than guesswork. I have realised that my past is in the "public domain" and therefore somewhat beyond my control but the opinions that were appearing on this page were causing distress to both myself and my family.

I have been advised to ask to remove the second website that is listed as it duplicates the only one over which I have any input and influence. How do I do this?

I understand that pages on Wikipedia can be "protected". Is that right? I am afraid that I do not understand its system very well. It would be nice to know that it will not once again be subjected to opinion.

Once again, I thank you all for being of so much help and so quickly. It is refreshing to see that not all of the internet is about exploitation and that there are some (if just a few) friendly people out there.

Tove Jensen 13:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Website URL
I have corrected this page once again by putting up the correct link to my website. I realise that the site is now getting outdated and I have asked my webmaster friends here in Denmark (not Sweden!) to redo it for September. As part of that will be a rewritten biography that will be much longer and more accurate.

I would very much appreciate it if people would stop changing the URL or deleting it as it would be nice for people who care and know me to read the real story of this part of my life.

I will also update the wikipedia page to be more accurate.

Those editors on Wikipedia that have come to know me are already aware that I do not like to raise my head in public. Since, however, people do seem to be interested in a part of me that is long since gone, I feel that it is important that I try and keep the Wikipedia page as accurate as possible.

Thank you,

Tove.


 * Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not in the business of publicizing web sites, even ones that purport to be about the subject of an article. As I'm sure you've noticed, over the years there have been many, many websites published by many different parties, all of which purport to be "Tove Jensen's Official Site."  We have no way from distinguishing the URL you have provided from any of the others.
 * If you wish for this material to be included, the appropriate course of action is to arrange for it to be covered or published in some third party reliable source known for fact checking -- for example, a reputable Danish or Swedish newspaper; Wikipedia could then refer to your web site, relying on the reputation of that reliable source. Wikipedia itself is simply not equipped to verify first party claims such as those made on this page, and such material is generally not allowed.
 * Kinds regards,
 * Nandesuka