User talk:Toveezy/Daddy (poem)

Audry Hernandez - Peer Review
'''Lead - Your lead is off to a strong start. There is a possibility that some of the information in the lead, such as Plath's complex relationship with her father, could be used in another, more personal section of the article. You could put it in the upcoming section that talks about the circumstances she wrote it in, I believe it'll flow a little better. The lead should capture the idea and the essence of the poem, which I think you do very nicely for the most part.'''

Grace McGuire Peer Review
''' Grace McGuire Peer Review I'll only be reviewing the lead section because that's all that's present in the draft currently.

-A lead section that is easy to understand The lead section is kinda lengthy, and it contains a lot more info than your average basic summary would. It gives more weight to the biographical content than it probably should, and I think that info could best be saved for a "History" section.

-A clear structure The current article has a lot of info in the "Reception and interpretation" section that I think could be balanced out with a "History" section from info used in the lead section.

-Balanced coverage The coverage offers multiple interpretations of the text with equal weight, not attempting to portray one as more valid than another.

-Neutral content

The content I'm reviewing is limited, but it does not include any first person information. It focuses mostly on criticism and less so on critical acclaim.

-Reliable sources

I believe the author is still writing this draft, because there are no sources for their information.

Overall: I think this author is going in the right direction with their lead section, and I think moving some information around and doing more sourcing would benefit this writer.

Gracemcguire17 (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Lead
Looks like an interesting topic. The lead is well put together and concise. If all the to-be sections end up like this the whole article will be great.

Structure
What sections will be included isn’t exactly clear, I would suggest creating sections to guide you through writing it -- refer to other articles on single poems to get an idea of what sections you could create for yours

Balance/Neutrality
Article is generally objective and factual. Writing about reception or criticism as a section might be the more challenging to stay neutral, but so far so good.

Sourcing
There aren’t any sources included yet, but it’s apparent where there will be some citations included. I would suggest putting all of your sources at the bottom of the draft so they’re easy to reach when you need to add them later, as well as to make it easy for peer editing to check on sources, etc. (if interested, refer to my article draft to get an idea). Cingham (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)