User talk:Tower1109

Welcome!
Hello, Tower1109, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Belén Fernández
I've reverted your edits to this article. There are several reasons for this.

Thanks for understanding. Again, feel free to propose corrections and improvements on the article's talk page. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * First and foremost, you should not be rewriting articles on topics where you have a conflict of interest. You have acknowledged that the subject of the article is a family member of yours. That's a conflict of interest. Feel free to propose corrections and improvements on the article's talk page.
 * You introduced unsourced, heavily biased statements such as "injustices of the neoliberal order, including the failure of mainstream media to accurately represent the facts of political and social events". If that's a previously published "mission statement" of the subject, including it with context, quotes and a reference would be fine; presenting it as objective fact is not.
 * You removed links to other relevant Wikipedia articles and in some cases replaced them with external links in the body of the article and an excessive list of external links at the end of the article, both of which should be avoided.
 * You removed the references section and the article's only two references. References are the most important part of Wikipedia articles.


 * I see you reinstated your changes, but you don't seem to have provided any reason for doing so. I explained my reasons above and in my edit summary. Would you please extend me the same courtesy? If you're not willing to play by the rules, the next step will be Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello: thank you for your valuable observations and helpful remarks. The page has been edited to reflect your concerns. Sorry for the delay in responding via this medium; It has taken me a while to figure out just how to do that.
 * Tower1109 (talk) 14:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * It seems you've ignored the most important point above: you should not be rewriting articles on topics where you have a conflict of interest. Also, you should not be removing notices informing the reader about this conflict of interest, as you did here. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with..."Cite error: There are tags with nothing between them., I have removed them with this edit. JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Process for requesting review of edits
I am requesting help with what has turned into an editing war on Belen Fernandez. The history is pretty clear. Thank you very much, as always.

Tower1109 (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You've been blocked for WP:3RR. Thank you for bringing this to our attention though I'm sure you weren't expecting WP:BOOMERANG. Your conduct has been brought up here and at Talk:Belén Fernández. Mkdw talk 18:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Belén Fernández. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mkdw talk 18:28, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you
I'm finding it difficult to respond in the correct place, but I do appreciate your comments and actions. Please advise where/how I can respond at length. The objective is to arrive at a Wikipedia entry that meets standards. Thank you. Tower1109 (talk) 21:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Once your block expires, continue the discussion on the article talk page. Now that the page has pending changes, it will be on you and the other editors to reach a consensus before implementing changes to the article. Mkdw talk 01:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Requesting WP:SOCK review
Requesting review by Wikipedia administrators of sock puppetry WP:SOCK by the only three unsigned users who are editing Belén Fernández and arguing for its deletion; 141.138.186.38, 93.185.224.196, and 146.185.36.67. All three have IP addresses from Beirut Lebanon and they all use the same tone, language, and arguments. The first 2 addresses have made no other contributions to Wikipedia besides their arguments against the page; the only other contribution from the third is Path Solutions, which has been flagged as an orphan page and overly promotional.