User talk:Towersc/sandbox

'''First, this part of the assignment should be in Sandbox, not Sandbox/talk. Please move it so your group members can see it.''' J.R. Council (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

There are many issues with this article, mainly relating to completeness. The first thing that I notice when I look at the article is the tiny introduction that is provided. There is a lot more information that could be provided such as what his inkblots actually did for the world of psychology.

References:

Schwarz, W. (1996). Hermann Rorschach MD: His life and work. Rorschachiana, 21, 6–17.

Hegarty, P. (2003a). “More feminine than 999 men out of 1,000:” The construction of sex roles in psychology. In T. Lester (Ed.), Gender nonconformity, race, and sexuality: Charting the connections (pp. 62-83). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin

Questions: 1. When editing the introduction should we focus on a explaining all of his achievements or should we focus on the inkblot test since that is what he is known for?

'''Focus on the person. There is already a good article on the Rorschach inkblot test. If you need to refer to it, just link to that article.'''

2. When talking about publications that he has made, how detailed should we explain what the publications cover before it would be too much that may require it's own wiki page?Astuhl (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

'''I don't think you'll find a lot of publications. Those you do find, just keep your coverage relevant to the topic of the article, Hermann Rorschach.''' J.R. Council (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Feedback
Nice work. Looks good, except for two things
 * The first two paragraphs in the "Career" section don't have references. You should have at least one reference per paragraph, and no text after the last reference in a paragraph.
 * Section headers use sentence capitalization, not title capitalization; only the first word of the title, and proper nouns, should be capitalized. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:25, 27 April 2018 (UTC)