User talk:ToxicWasteGrounds

Satan, His Psychotherapy and Cure by the Unfortunate Dr. Kassler, J.S.P.S.
I have removed your speedy delete tag from this article as it doesn't appear to be a hoax. the article originally included links to amazon and goodreads, and a google search turns up book reviews, just none by reliable sources that I can find, thus my prod tag. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiDan61 RfA
It's generally better form not to transclude an RfA before the candidate has a chance to accept the nomination. Have the had the opportunity to ask if the editor wishes to be nominated?--~TPW 16:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

RfA
Thanks for the thought, but I have no interest in becoming an admin. As many have pointed out, I tend to be a deletionist, and while I don't see anything wrong with this (I like to keep the project clean), this is not a non-controversial position. I prefer to continue chugging along tagging articles when I see a problem, or fixing them when I think they can be, but with the safety net of other admins behind me. So, if you wouldn't mind, please do whatever is necessary to close the RfA. Thanks! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Would you like the record of the RfA to remain or would you like me to delete it for you under CSD G7? It's entirely up to you. Also, just for reference, it's usually a good idea to talk to the candidate before you create an RfA (unless you know they're up for it) and it shouldn't be transcluded until they've signed to accept it. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:15, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It has already been deleted as WikiDan61 had declined. Toxic  Waste  Grounds  16:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. My compliments on being brave enough to nominate someone, though- it's not something I've ever done and don't plan on doing any time soon ;) Btw, I've seen you around- you're obviously doing good work, keep it up! Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the recognition :) Regards, Toxic  Waste  Grounds  16:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * (like 4 of them) Hi ToxicWasteGrounds, I have deleted the RfA. The reason I deleted it is that if WikiDan61 should want to run for RfA in the future it would be considered his first time running. In the future please do not create an RfA for someone else you are nominating until they have indicated that they will accept a nomination. Please see Requests for adminship/nominate for further details. Thanks, Valley2 city ‽ 16:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Another thing I may wish to note, when notifying someone about an RfA, make a new section as User:Moutray2010 now thinks I made it for him. Toxic  Waste  Grounds  16:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanx
i noticed it but i didnt kno how to change it but thanx for the alert atleast. Pope132 (talk) 16:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome :) After 4 days and 10 edits, you will be able to move pages so if you make that kind of mistake again, then you can correct it. Keep up the good work :) Regards, Toxic  Waste  Grounds  16:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

how did u even kno that i made that article that fast? Pope132 (talk) 16:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Special:NewPages. As a new pages patroller, I monitor the newly created pages and decide whether they need improvements, fixing or if they're just plain trash. Toxic  Waste  Grounds  16:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

is mine ok. or do i need to make some changes to it?Pope132 (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's ok. Toxic  Waste  Grounds  16:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

HI

I am grateful for your nomination and wish to humbly accept this.

kind regards ,

Paul —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moutray2010 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * Oh, there are alternate means. However, emailing me won't do any good; I went purely by technical evidence, and, given that you edit from a very dynamic DNS range -- at most a dozen or two on each IP -- and given that an account claiming to be the vandal in question signed on on one of those IPs within minutes of your last edit on that IP, it's highly unlikely that my checkuser analysis is incorrect; other checkusers may wish to double-check, but I'm done with this one. --jpgordon:==( o ) 20:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)